Discretization or Sequentiality? Exploring UI Layouts for Reading-to-Learn Processes on Mixed Reality Headsets

As mixed reality (MR) systems grow in popularity, understanding how virtual-physical panel layouts impact reading and learning is crucial. This study investigates four MR layout designs driven by two dimensions: discretization (continuous vs. discrete) and sequentiality (progressive vs. full disclosure). We conducted two experiments: a 24-participant study using low-difficulty reading materials to gather user perspectives, and a 48-participant study evaluating learning performance and user experience (UX) during high-difficulty tasks. Results indicate that continuous, full-disclosure layouts reduced reading time and improved UX by lowering motion sickness and workload compared to discrete, full-disclosure designs. Conversely, discrete, progressive-disclosure layouts required more time but yielded higher knowledge acquisition than other patterns. These findings provide actionable insights for MR designers creating interfaces that integrate virtual information with physical reading materials to optimize both user comfort and learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2744832
Primary Topic
Interactive and Immersive Displays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Discretization or Sequentiality? Exploring UI Layouts for Reading-to-Learn Processes on Mixed Reality Headsets

Pan Hui, Junze Ma, Mingming Fan, Lik‐Hang Lee et al.
1 links
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Interactive and Immersive Displays
article

Discretization or Sequentiality? Exploring UI Layouts for Reading-to-Learn Processes on Mixed Reality Headsets

Pan Hui, Junze Ma, Mingming Fan, Lik‐Hang Lee, Wenqi Zheng, Yulu Hu, Kairong Fang
article en

Abstract

As mixed reality (MR) systems grow in popularity, understanding how virtual-physical panel layouts impact reading and learning is crucial. This study investigates four MR layout designs driven by two dimensions: discretization (continuous vs. discrete) and sequentiality (progressive vs. full disclosure). We conducted two experiments: a 24-participant study using low-difficulty reading materials to gather user perspectives, and a 48-participant study evaluating learning performance and user experience (UX) during high-difficulty tasks. Results indicate that continuous, full-disclosure layouts reduced reading time and improved UX by lowering motion sickness and workload compared to discrete, full-disclosure designs. Conversely, discrete, progressive-disclosure layouts required more time but yielded higher knowledge acquisition than other patterns. These findings provide actionable insights for MR designers creating interfaces that integrate virtual information with physical reading materials to optimize both user comfort and learning outcomes.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
Interactive and Immersive Displays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon