Prevalence and Angiographic Severity of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Presenting with a Dilated Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Background and Objectives: Identification of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients presenting with a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype is clinically important because it may influence etiologic classification, prognosis, and subsequent management. However, real-world angiography-based data on the prevalence and angiographic severity of obstructive CAD in this setting remain limited, particularly in regional single-center cohorts. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients presenting with a newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype of initially unknown etiology who underwent first-time diagnostic invasive coronary angiography at St. Marina University Hospital, Varna, Bulgaria, between January 2010 and December 2025. Obstructive CAD was defined as stenosis >70% in a major epicardial coronary artery with a reference vessel diameter >2.5 mm. Patients were categorized as having non-obstructive or no significant coronary stenoses, single-vessel disease, two-vessel disease, or three-vessel disease. Additional descriptive analysis assessed severe occlusive coronary lesions, defined as chronic total occlusions or subtotal stenoses. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of obstructive CAD. Secondary analyses included angiographic disease extent, vessel-level coronary involvement, severe occlusive lesions, and coronary revascularization. Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Mean age was 55.4 ± 10.9 years, and 97 patients (90.7%) were male. Obstructive CAD was identified in 19 patients (17.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7–26.1%), whereas 88 patients (82.2%) had non-obstructive or no significant coronary stenoses. Among patients with obstructive CAD, 3 (15.8%) had single-vessel disease, 4 (21.1%) had two-vessel disease, and 12 (63.2%) had three-vessel disease. Severe occlusive coronary lesions were present in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%); 8 (42.1%) had at least one chronic total occlusion and 5 (26.3%) had at least one subtotal stenosis. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center cohort of patients presenting with a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype and referred for coronary angiography, obstructive CAD was present in fewer than one in five patients. In contrast, most had non-obstructive or no significant epicardial coronary stenoses. However, when obstructive CAD was present, three-vessel disease and severe occlusive lesions were frequent. These findings indicate that obstructive epicardial CAD was uncommon in this selected angiography-referred cohort while underscoring the clinical role of coronary angiography when an ischemic or mixed etiology is clinically suspected.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62081608
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Angiographic Severity of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Presenting with a Dilated Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Rozen Grigorov, Ivaylo Borisov, Stefan Yambolov, Nikolay Nikolov et al.
Medicina
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Prevalence and Angiographic Severity of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Presenting with a Dilated Cardiomyopathy Phenotype: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Rozen Grigorov, Ivaylo Borisov, Stefan Yambolov, Nikolay Nikolov, Svetoslav Georgiev
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Identification of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients presenting with a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype is clinically important because it may influence etiologic classification, prognosis, and subsequent management. However, real-world angiography-based data on the prevalence and angiographic severity of obstructive CAD in this setting remain limited, particularly in regional single-center cohorts. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients presenting with a newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype of initially unknown etiology who underwent first-time diagnostic invasive coronary angiography at St. Marina University Hospital, Varna, Bulgaria, between January 2010 and December 2025. Obstructive CAD was defined as stenosis >70% in a major epicardial coronary artery with a reference vessel diameter >2.5 mm. Patients were categorized as having non-obstructive or no significant coronary stenoses, single-vessel disease, two-vessel disease, or three-vessel disease. Additional descriptive analysis assessed severe occlusive coronary lesions, defined as chronic total occlusions or subtotal stenoses. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of obstructive CAD. Secondary analyses included angiographic disease extent, vessel-level coronary involvement, severe occlusive lesions, and coronary revascularization. Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Mean age was 55.4 ± 10.9 years, and 97 patients (90.7%) were male. Obstructive CAD was identified in 19 patients (17.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7–26.1%), whereas 88 patients (82.2%) had non-obstructive or no significant coronary stenoses. Among patients with obstructive CAD, 3 (15.8%) had single-vessel disease, 4 (21.1%) had two-vessel disease, and 12 (63.2%) had three-vessel disease. Severe occlusive coronary lesions were present in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%); 8 (42.1%) had at least one chronic total occlusion and 5 (26.3%) had at least one subtotal stenosis. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center cohort of patients presenting with a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype and referred for coronary angiography, obstructive CAD was present in fewer than one in five patients. In contrast, most had non-obstructive or no significant epicardial coronary stenoses. However, when obstructive CAD was present, three-vessel disease and severe occlusive lesions were frequent. These findings indicate that obstructive epicardial CAD was uncommon in this selected angiography-referred cohort while underscoring the clinical role of coronary angiography when an ischemic or mixed etiology is clinically suspected.

MedicinaVol. 62(8)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.