Validity of the German version of the FCR-1r questionnaire in patients with urologic cancer.

Introduction Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) is a prevalent and distressing issue for a significant proportion of cancer patients across various disciplines, yet it remains one of the most frequently unaddressed psychosocial needs. A key barrier to identifying affected individuals is the lack of brief screening tools suitable for clinical settings. The objective of this research is to validate the one-item FCR screening tool (FCR-1r) in a German cohort of urologic cancer patients. Validating such an ultra-brief measure may help address this clinically relevant gap and serve as a viable, clinically applicable alternative to lengthy questionnaires. Methods Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Criterion validity was assessed against the CARQ-4. Convergent validity was tested against the FoP-Q-SF and GAD-7. Discriminant validity was tested against the HLS-EU-Q16. Validity was assessed using chi-square tests with phi coefficients, accuracy measures, negative and positive predictive values, sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios. Results The final analysis sample consisted of 236 participants with complete data on all study measures. The FCR-1r demonstrated excellent criterion validity with respect to the CARQ-4 (χ²(1) = 101.97, p < 0.001, φ = 0.66), with an overall accuracy of 84% (95% CI: 79-89%). Sensitivity was 84%, and specificity was 85%. The analysis of convergent validity revealed a moderate association with both the FoP-Q-SF (χ²(1) = 20.25, p < 0.001, φ = 0.29; accuracy 62% (95% CI: 56-68%)) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (χ²(1) = 11.82, p < 0.001, φ = 0.22; accuracy 64% (95% CI: 58-70%)). The analysis of discriminant validity showed no significant association between the FCR-1r and health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16): χ²(1) = 3.44, p = 0.064, φ = 0.12. Conclusion The German version of the FCR-1r demonstrates good psychometric properties, confirming its validity as a tool for assessing fear of cancer recurrence in clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/ort/aecag002
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of the German version of the FCR-1r questionnaire in patients with urologic cancer.

Ulrike Dinger, André Karger, Sebastian Sage, Dominik Fugmann et al.
PubMed
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Validity of the German version of the FCR-1r questionnaire in patients with urologic cancer.

Ulrike Dinger, André Karger, Sebastian Sage, Dominik Fugmann, Ralf Bernhard Schäfer, Guenter Niegisch, Can Dümdüz, Sofia Kugler, Christian Schulz-Quach
article en

Abstract

Introduction Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) is a prevalent and distressing issue for a significant proportion of cancer patients across various disciplines, yet it remains one of the most frequently unaddressed psychosocial needs. A key barrier to identifying affected individuals is the lack of brief screening tools suitable for clinical settings. The objective of this research is to validate the one-item FCR screening tool (FCR-1r) in a German cohort of urologic cancer patients. Validating such an ultra-brief measure may help address this clinically relevant gap and serve as a viable, clinically applicable alternative to lengthy questionnaires. Methods Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Criterion validity was assessed against the CARQ-4. Convergent validity was tested against the FoP-Q-SF and GAD-7. Discriminant validity was tested against the HLS-EU-Q16. Validity was assessed using chi-square tests with phi coefficients, accuracy measures, negative and positive predictive values, sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios. Results The final analysis sample consisted of 236 participants with complete data on all study measures. The FCR-1r demonstrated excellent criterion validity with respect to the CARQ-4 (χ²(1) = 101.97, p < 0.001, φ = 0.66), with an overall accuracy of 84% (95% CI: 79-89%). Sensitivity was 84%, and specificity was 85%. The analysis of convergent validity revealed a moderate association with both the FoP-Q-SF (χ²(1) = 20.25, p < 0.001, φ = 0.29; accuracy 62% (95% CI: 56-68%)) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (χ²(1) = 11.82, p < 0.001, φ = 0.22; accuracy 64% (95% CI: 58-70%)). The analysis of discriminant validity showed no significant association between the FCR-1r and health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16): χ²(1) = 3.44, p = 0.064, φ = 0.12. Conclusion The German version of the FCR-1r demonstrates good psychometric properties, confirming its validity as a tool for assessing fear of cancer recurrence in clinical practice.

PubMed
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.