Preliminary effects of myofascial release on chest mobility and trunk impairmentin patients with chronic stroke: a pilotRandomized controlled trial

Objective This study investigated the effects of myofascial release (MFR) on chest mobility, trunk impairment, and respiratory function in patients with chronic stroke.Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 20 participants with chronic stroke were assigned to either an MFR group (n = 10) receiving MFR plus inspiratory muscle training (IMT) or a stretching and diaphragmatic breathing (SDB) group (n = 10) receiving chest stretching, diaphragmatic breathing, and IMT three and two times per week, respectively, for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was chest mobility measured at the axillary, xiphisternal, and basal levels. Secondary outcomes included trunk impairment (Trunk Impairment Scale, TIS), inspiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and quality of life (SS-QoL).Results Significant group × time interactions were observed for xiphisternal chest mobility (estimate = 1.34 cm, 95% CI 0.24–2.43; Cohen’s d = 1.15; p = .019), basal chest mobility (estimate = 1.33 cm, 95% CI 0.28–2.39; Cohen’s d = 1.19; p = .016), and trunk impairment (estimate = 2.10 points, 95% CI 0.13–4.07; Cohen’s d = 1.00;p = .038), favoring the MFR group. At the axillary level, both groups demonstrated significant improvements over time (p = .001), but no significant group × time interaction was observed (p = .098). MIP increased significantly in both groups over time (p = .001), with no between-group difference (p = .255). No significant between-group differences were observed for pulmonary function or SS-QoL outcomes (all p > .05).Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that eight weeks of MFR combined with IMT may improve lower chest mobility and reduce trunk impairment in patients with chronic stroke. MFR may be considered a potentially useful adjunct intervention to address thoracoabdominal mobility restrictions during stroke rehabilitation. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and determine their clinical significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2712998
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary effects of myofascial release on chest mobility and trunk impairmentin patients with chronic stroke: a pilotRandomized controlled trial

Haneul Lee, Sinyoung Kim, Saetbyeol Lee
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Preliminary effects of myofascial release on chest mobility and trunk impairmentin patients with chronic stroke: a pilotRandomized controlled trial

Haneul Lee, Sinyoung Kim, Saetbyeol Lee
article en

Abstract

Objective This study investigated the effects of myofascial release (MFR) on chest mobility, trunk impairment, and respiratory function in patients with chronic stroke.Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 20 participants with chronic stroke were assigned to either an MFR group (n = 10) receiving MFR plus inspiratory muscle training (IMT) or a stretching and diaphragmatic breathing (SDB) group (n = 10) receiving chest stretching, diaphragmatic breathing, and IMT three and two times per week, respectively, for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was chest mobility measured at the axillary, xiphisternal, and basal levels. Secondary outcomes included trunk impairment (Trunk Impairment Scale, TIS), inspiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and quality of life (SS-QoL).Results Significant group × time interactions were observed for xiphisternal chest mobility (estimate = 1.34 cm, 95% CI 0.24–2.43; Cohen’s d = 1.15; p = .019), basal chest mobility (estimate = 1.33 cm, 95% CI 0.28–2.39; Cohen’s d = 1.19; p = .016), and trunk impairment (estimate = 2.10 points, 95% CI 0.13–4.07; Cohen’s d = 1.00;p = .038), favoring the MFR group. At the axillary level, both groups demonstrated significant improvements over time (p = .001), but no significant group × time interaction was observed (p = .098). MIP increased significantly in both groups over time (p = .001), with no between-group difference (p = .255). No significant between-group differences were observed for pulmonary function or SS-QoL outcomes (all p > .05).Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that eight weeks of MFR combined with IMT may improve lower chest mobility and reduce trunk impairment in patients with chronic stroke. MFR may be considered a potentially useful adjunct intervention to address thoracoabdominal mobility restrictions during stroke rehabilitation. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and determine their clinical significance.

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Gachon University (KR), Ansan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.