From Steno to Haüy: early crystallography and the global history of mineral classification

The intellectual foundations of geology are inseparable from advances in mineralogy and crystallography. This study reviews the transition from descriptive mineral catalogues to quantitative science, emphasizing Nicolas Steno’s seventeenth-century law of constancy of interfacial angles and René-Just Haüy’s crystallographic theory articulated in Traité de Minéralogie (1801). These milestones established mineralogy as a rigorous discipline and provided the structural basis for modern crystallography. Parallel debates in Europe, particularly Werner’s Neptunism and Hutton’s Plutonism, framed competing models of rock genesis and shaped the emergence of petrology. Beyond Europe, comparative perspectives highlight Chinese materia medica, Indian gemological and metallurgical treatises, and Islamic alchemical traditions, which independently classified minerals and advanced experimental techniques. Synthesizing these contributions reveals mineralogy as a global scientific enterprise that connected natural philosophy, chemistry, and geology. This historical analysis demonstrates how crystallography and mineral classification formed the cornerstone of modern geoscience and materials research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Crystallography Reviews
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0889311x.2026.2710224
Primary Topic
History of Science and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Steno to Haüy: early crystallography and the global history of mineral classification

Jayant Kumar Sahoo
Crystallography Reviews
History of Science and Natural History
article

From Steno to Haüy: early crystallography and the global history of mineral classification

Jayant Kumar Sahoo
article en

Abstract

The intellectual foundations of geology are inseparable from advances in mineralogy and crystallography. This study reviews the transition from descriptive mineral catalogues to quantitative science, emphasizing Nicolas Steno’s seventeenth-century law of constancy of interfacial angles and René-Just Haüy’s crystallographic theory articulated in Traité de Minéralogie (1801). These milestones established mineralogy as a rigorous discipline and provided the structural basis for modern crystallography. Parallel debates in Europe, particularly Werner’s Neptunism and Hutton’s Plutonism, framed competing models of rock genesis and shaped the emergence of petrology. Beyond Europe, comparative perspectives highlight Chinese materia medica, Indian gemological and metallurgical treatises, and Islamic alchemical traditions, which independently classified minerals and advanced experimental techniques. Synthesizing these contributions reveals mineralogy as a global scientific enterprise that connected natural philosophy, chemistry, and geology. This historical analysis demonstrates how crystallography and mineral classification formed the cornerstone of modern geoscience and materials research.

Crystallography Reviews
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
History of Science and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.