Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine in Prison: Insights From a Short‐Answer Survey of People in the <scp>Criminal Justice System</scp> Commencing <scp>Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine</scp> During a Non‐Randomised Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) is increasingly used in the Criminal Justice System (CJS) for treating people with opioid use disorder; however, little is known about these patients' experiences. We aimed to understand the perspectives of participants commenced on LAIB in prison as a part of the Understanding NSW Long-Active Opioids in Custody-Treatment (UNLOC-T) study. METHODS: Results of an open-ended survey administered by UNLOC-T researchers underwent analysis. Participants were adults, recruited November 2018-July 2019, with moderate-severe opioid use disorder and ≥ 6 months remaining on their sentence. We conducted a thematic analysis using a pragmatic, descriptive coding approach. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants were included, of which 82% were male. Five primary themes were identified that described participants' experiences and highlighted issues that can directly inform service delivery: medication effectiveness, social and relational considerations, dosing frequency, financial aspects, and health and wellbeing. There was considerable variation in participant perspectives within themes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives on LAIB are diverse, suggesting a need to individualise treatment and ensure person-centered care. While LAIB offers benefits to warrant including it as a treatment option, challenges remain. Future research into LAIB in the CJS would allow for triangulation, as well as further exploration of ongoing acceptability in the post-release period. Our findings could help to improve the way LAIB is offered as a treatment option or delivered to people in the CJS. There are also lessons for prescribers in counselling and tailoring treatment, and broader policy considerations around access to treatment formulations and patient autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug and Alcohol Review
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70214
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine in Prison: Insights From a Short‐Answer Survey of People in the Criminal Justice System Commencing Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine During a Non‐Randomised Clinical Trial

Adrian Dunlop, Amelia Woods, Jillian Roberts, Bethany White et al.
Drug and Alcohol Review
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine in Prison: Insights From a Short‐Answer Survey of People in the Criminal Justice System Commencing Long‐Acting Injectable Buprenorphine During a Non‐Randomised Clinical Trial

Adrian Dunlop, Amelia Woods, Jillian Roberts, Bethany White, Elizabeth McEntyre, Paul Haber, Michael Doyle, Nicholas Lintzeris, Catherine Foley
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) is increasingly used in the Criminal Justice System (CJS) for treating people with opioid use disorder; however, little is known about these patients' experiences. We aimed to understand the perspectives of participants commenced on LAIB in prison as a part of the Understanding NSW Long-Active Opioids in Custody-Treatment (UNLOC-T) study. METHODS: Results of an open-ended survey administered by UNLOC-T researchers underwent analysis. Participants were adults, recruited November 2018-July 2019, with moderate-severe opioid use disorder and ≥ 6 months remaining on their sentence. We conducted a thematic analysis using a pragmatic, descriptive coding approach. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants were included, of which 82% were male. Five primary themes were identified that described participants' experiences and highlighted issues that can directly inform service delivery: medication effectiveness, social and relational considerations, dosing frequency, financial aspects, and health and wellbeing. There was considerable variation in participant perspectives within themes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives on LAIB are diverse, suggesting a need to individualise treatment and ensure person-centered care. While LAIB offers benefits to warrant including it as a treatment option, challenges remain. Future research into LAIB in the CJS would allow for triangulation, as well as further exploration of ongoing acceptability in the post-release period. Our findings could help to improve the way LAIB is offered as a treatment option or delivered to people in the CJS. There are also lessons for prescribers in counselling and tailoring treatment, and broader policy considerations around access to treatment formulations and patient autonomy.

Drug and Alcohol ReviewVol. 45(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), IP Australia (AU), Alcohol and Drug Foundation (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.