When conflict leaves the rules: party institutionalisation, system closure and legislative violence in Europe

Physical violence in legislatures is rare, but it marks a moment when parliamentary conflict escapes the rules that are meant to contain it. This article examines reported incidents of physical violence in 43 European legislatures from 1980 to 2021. It argues that party institutionalisation reduces the risk of violence by making discipline, bargaining authority, and future competition more predictable. Party-system closure has a more conditional role. In less polarised settings, closure may reassure losers that competition remains organised and repeatable. In more polarised settings, closure can make exclusion more salient, especially at intermediate-to-high levels of closure. The evidence shows that violence is less common where parties are more institutionalised and that closure’s association with violence depends on polarisation. The findings locate legislative brawls within ordinary problems of party organisation, legislative contestation, and democratic restraint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legislative Studies
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2026.2708491
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When conflict leaves the rules: party institutionalisation, system closure and legislative violence in Europe

Yang Zhang
Journal of Legislative Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

When conflict leaves the rules: party institutionalisation, system closure and legislative violence in Europe

Yang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Physical violence in legislatures is rare, but it marks a moment when parliamentary conflict escapes the rules that are meant to contain it. This article examines reported incidents of physical violence in 43 European legislatures from 1980 to 2021. It argues that party institutionalisation reduces the risk of violence by making discipline, bargaining authority, and future competition more predictable. Party-system closure has a more conditional role. In less polarised settings, closure may reassure losers that competition remains organised and repeatable. In more polarised settings, closure can make exclusion more salient, especially at intermediate-to-high levels of closure. The evidence shows that violence is less common where parties are more institutionalised and that closure’s association with violence depends on polarisation. The findings locate legislative brawls within ordinary problems of party organisation, legislative contestation, and democratic restraint.

Journal of Legislative Studies
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.