Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Perineal pain is common after vaginal birth and might affect maternal well-being and mother-infant bonding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of heat or cooling therapy at delivery on postpartum perineal pain. METHODS: This pilot open-label, multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial included all women without history of vaginal birth, randomly (1:1) assigned to receive heat therapy (HT, warm compresses) or standard care (SC) during pushing, and cooling therapy (CT, cold pack) or SC during immediate postpartum. The primary outcome was the mean of repeated measures of perineal pain intensity (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes included perineal healing, additional analgesic use, childbirth experience, and perineal injuries. Analyses were conducted on a complete-case intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: From May 2022 to December 2023, 115 women were enrolled and 105 randomized (early termination at 50% of the planned inclusions). Pain intensity was not statistically different between groups: HT versus SC (4.0 ± 2.5 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, mean difference [95% CI] = 0.43 [-0.56, 1.41]; P = 0.39); CT versus SC (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.2, mean difference = 0.93 [-0.04, 1.91]; P = 0.06). No statistically significant interaction was observed. HT was not associated with any difference in terms of perineal tear (respectively, with and without HT, for first, second, and third degree tear: 49.0 vs. 54.9%, 37.3 vs. 31.4%, and 5.9 vs. 5.9%; P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: No clear evidence of benefit of heat or cooling therapy for preventing postpartum perineal pain was observed. These non-pharmaceutical methods were generally well accepted by the women and were easy for midwives to implement. Further studies are needed to explore optimal timing, modalities, and target populations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PERISAFE protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrial database (2021-03-03, No.NCT04778631). The first participant was recruited in May 2022 (2022-05-16).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71243
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial

Anne Alice Chantry, Laurent Mandelbrot, Pauline Blanc‐Petitjean, Clara Rollet et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial

Anne Alice Chantry, Laurent Mandelbrot, Pauline Blanc‐Petitjean, Clara Rollet, Géraldine Meunier, Camille Le Ray
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perineal pain is common after vaginal birth and might affect maternal well-being and mother-infant bonding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of heat or cooling therapy at delivery on postpartum perineal pain. METHODS: This pilot open-label, multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial included all women without history of vaginal birth, randomly (1:1) assigned to receive heat therapy (HT, warm compresses) or standard care (SC) during pushing, and cooling therapy (CT, cold pack) or SC during immediate postpartum. The primary outcome was the mean of repeated measures of perineal pain intensity (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes included perineal healing, additional analgesic use, childbirth experience, and perineal injuries. Analyses were conducted on a complete-case intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: From May 2022 to December 2023, 115 women were enrolled and 105 randomized (early termination at 50% of the planned inclusions). Pain intensity was not statistically different between groups: HT versus SC (4.0 ± 2.5 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, mean difference [95% CI] = 0.43 [-0.56, 1.41]; P = 0.39); CT versus SC (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.2, mean difference = 0.93 [-0.04, 1.91]; P = 0.06). No statistically significant interaction was observed. HT was not associated with any difference in terms of perineal tear (respectively, with and without HT, for first, second, and third degree tear: 49.0 vs. 54.9%, 37.3 vs. 31.4%, and 5.9 vs. 5.9%; P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: No clear evidence of benefit of heat or cooling therapy for preventing postpartum perineal pain was observed. These non-pharmaceutical methods were generally well accepted by the women and were easy for midwives to implement. Further studies are needed to explore optimal timing, modalities, and target populations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PERISAFE protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrial database (2021-03-03, No.NCT04778631). The first participant was recruited in May 2022 (2022-05-16).

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Louis-Mourier (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Maternité Port Royal (FR), Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.