Trial‐History Effects During <scp>WCST</scp> in Treatment‐Resistant Schizophrenia

AIM: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is a clinically important subtype of schizophrenia, but its cognitive characteristics remain incompletely understood. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is widely used to assess executive dysfunction in schizophrenia, although conventional summary analyses may overlook trial-by-trial behavioral adaptation. This study aimed to examine whether recent trial outcome modulates subsequent responding differently between TRS and non-TRS patients during the WCST. METHODS: We analyzed WCST data from 41 outpatients with schizophrenia, including 13 patients with TRS and 28 with non-TRS. Conventional subject-level indices, including perseveration rate and outcome-dependent reaction time (RT) adjustment, were first compared between groups. We then performed trial-level linear mixed-effects analyses using log-transformed RT as the dependent variable, with previous trial correctness, treatment resistance, their interaction, age, and sex as fixed effects. Additional sensitivity analyses included models with by-subject random slopes for previous trial correctness and analysis in an age-matched sample. RESULTS: Conventional summary analyses showed no significant group differences in perseveration rate or RT measures. In the primary model, previous trial correctness significantly modulated subsequent RT, and the interaction between previous trial correctness and TRS suggested a group difference in outcome-dependent RT modulation. Specifically, the RT difference between trials following error and correct responses appeared smaller in TRS patients than in non-TRS patients. However, sensitivity analyses using by-subject random slopes and an age-matched sample showed similar directions and magnitudes of the interaction but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Conventional WCST summary analyses did not distinguish TRS from non-TRS patients, whereas trial-level modeling provided preliminary evidence for possible alteration of outcome-dependent response adjustment in TRS. These findings suggest that dynamic behavioral phenotypes may provide a useful complement to standard neuropsychological indices in characterizing cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia, but replication in larger samples is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70151
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trial‐History Effects During WCST in Treatment‐Resistant Schizophrenia

Ryo Sawagashira, Atsuhito Toyomaki, Hayato Watanabe, Naoki Hashimoto et al.
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Trial‐History Effects During WCST in Treatment‐Resistant Schizophrenia

Ryo Sawagashira, Atsuhito Toyomaki, Hayato Watanabe, Naoki Hashimoto, Takahiro A. Kato
article en

Abstract

AIM: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is a clinically important subtype of schizophrenia, but its cognitive characteristics remain incompletely understood. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is widely used to assess executive dysfunction in schizophrenia, although conventional summary analyses may overlook trial-by-trial behavioral adaptation. This study aimed to examine whether recent trial outcome modulates subsequent responding differently between TRS and non-TRS patients during the WCST. METHODS: We analyzed WCST data from 41 outpatients with schizophrenia, including 13 patients with TRS and 28 with non-TRS. Conventional subject-level indices, including perseveration rate and outcome-dependent reaction time (RT) adjustment, were first compared between groups. We then performed trial-level linear mixed-effects analyses using log-transformed RT as the dependent variable, with previous trial correctness, treatment resistance, their interaction, age, and sex as fixed effects. Additional sensitivity analyses included models with by-subject random slopes for previous trial correctness and analysis in an age-matched sample. RESULTS: Conventional summary analyses showed no significant group differences in perseveration rate or RT measures. In the primary model, previous trial correctness significantly modulated subsequent RT, and the interaction between previous trial correctness and TRS suggested a group difference in outcome-dependent RT modulation. Specifically, the RT difference between trials following error and correct responses appeared smaller in TRS patients than in non-TRS patients. However, sensitivity analyses using by-subject random slopes and an age-matched sample showed similar directions and magnitudes of the interaction but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Conventional WCST summary analyses did not distinguish TRS from non-TRS patients, whereas trial-level modeling provided preliminary evidence for possible alteration of outcome-dependent response adjustment in TRS. These findings suggest that dynamic behavioral phenotypes may provide a useful complement to standard neuropsychological indices in characterizing cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia, but replication in larger samples is needed.

Neuropsychopharmacology ReportsVol. 46(3)
Sapporo University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.