Structure–InterfaceCoupling in Li-Rich Mn-BasedCathodes for All-Solid-State Batteries: Single-Crystal Versus PolycrystallineArchitectures

Abstract Li-rich Mn-based layered oxides (LRM) are attractive high-energy cathodes for all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) because of their high theoretical capacity, low cost, and Mn-rich composition. However, their practical implementation is constrained by oxygen-redox instability, voltage decay, chemo-mechanical degradation, and parasitic interfacial reactions with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). These issues become more pronounced in ASSBs, where rigid solid–solid contact, limited interfacial wetting, and mechanically induced contact loss strongly affect cathode utilization and cycling stability. This review critically compares polycrystalline LRM (PC-LRM) and single-crystal LRM (SC-LRM) cathodes in ASSBs from the perspective of structure–interface coupling. PC-LRM provides high surface area and favorable electrolyte access in liquid cells, but its grain-boundary network and internal porosity accelerate lattice-oxygen release, electrolyte penetration, intergranular cracking, and electrochemical isolation in solid-state systems. In contrast, SC-LRM suppresses grain-boundary-induced cracking and reduces reactive interfacial area, thereby improving mechanical integrity and interfacial stability, although particle-size control, anisotropic Li-ion transport, exposed facets, and limited solid–solid contact remain important challenges. We further summarize recent progress in matching LRM cathodes with sulfide, halide, and oxide SSEs, focusing on surface coatings, elemental doping, oxygen-vacancy regulation, particle-size engineering, and interlayer design. Finally, we discuss electrolyte-specific design principles and future opportunities based on operando characterization, multiscale simulation, and machine-learning-guided materials optimization for high-energy ASSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00729
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure–InterfaceCoupling in Li-Rich Mn-BasedCathodes for All-Solid-State Batteries: Single-Crystal Versus PolycrystallineArchitectures

Deping Li, Lijie Ci, Xueyi Nie, Ximing Geng et al.
Crystal Growth & Design
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

Structure–InterfaceCoupling in Li-Rich Mn-BasedCathodes for All-Solid-State Batteries: Single-Crystal Versus PolycrystallineArchitectures

Deping Li, Lijie Ci, Xueyi Nie, Ximing Geng, Jingyu Lu, Jiaxin Zhao, Yixin Chen, Jiahui Yang, Jiayi Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Li-rich Mn-based layered oxides (LRM) are attractive high-energy cathodes for all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) because of their high theoretical capacity, low cost, and Mn-rich composition. However, their practical implementation is constrained by oxygen-redox instability, voltage decay, chemo-mechanical degradation, and parasitic interfacial reactions with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). These issues become more pronounced in ASSBs, where rigid solid–solid contact, limited interfacial wetting, and mechanically induced contact loss strongly affect cathode utilization and cycling stability. This review critically compares polycrystalline LRM (PC-LRM) and single-crystal LRM (SC-LRM) cathodes in ASSBs from the perspective of structure–interface coupling. PC-LRM provides high surface area and favorable electrolyte access in liquid cells, but its grain-boundary network and internal porosity accelerate lattice-oxygen release, electrolyte penetration, intergranular cracking, and electrochemical isolation in solid-state systems. In contrast, SC-LRM suppresses grain-boundary-induced cracking and reduces reactive interfacial area, thereby improving mechanical integrity and interfacial stability, although particle-size control, anisotropic Li-ion transport, exposed facets, and limited solid–solid contact remain important challenges. We further summarize recent progress in matching LRM cathodes with sulfide, halide, and oxide SSEs, focusing on surface coatings, elemental doping, oxygen-vacancy regulation, particle-size engineering, and interlayer design. Finally, we discuss electrolyte-specific design principles and future opportunities based on operando characterization, multiscale simulation, and machine-learning-guided materials optimization for high-energy ASSBs.

Crystal Growth & Design
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.