Navigation and Care Coordination in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient navigation on care coordination, health care access, appointment adherence, psychosocial outcomes, and equity among patients with breast cancer enrolled in the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) trial. METHODS: This prospective comparative analysis used pre- and postradiotherapy (RT) survey data from an ongoing multicenter phase I trial. The pre-RT cohort included 44 patients; post-RT analyses compared 14 patients who electively received navigation with 13 who did not. The cohort was predominantly low-income, with 89% reporting annual household income below $50,000. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean pre-RT composite score was 31.1, with transportation challenges and mixed perceptions of equitable care commonly reported. Post-RT, navigated patients reported more favorable accessibility, accommodation, and acceptability scores than nonnavigated patients, while affordability scores were similar. Complete appointment attendance was 92% with navigation versus 83% without navigation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation was associated with more favorable health care access experiences, though adherence differences were not statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000001357
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigation and Care Coordination in Breast Cancer

Ursula Burnette, Shearwood McClelland III, Afua Ofori-Darko, Misty Walker
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Navigation and Care Coordination in Breast Cancer

Ursula Burnette, Shearwood McClelland III, Afua Ofori-Darko, Misty Walker
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient navigation on care coordination, health care access, appointment adherence, psychosocial outcomes, and equity among patients with breast cancer enrolled in the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) trial. METHODS: This prospective comparative analysis used pre- and postradiotherapy (RT) survey data from an ongoing multicenter phase I trial. The pre-RT cohort included 44 patients; post-RT analyses compared 14 patients who electively received navigation with 13 who did not. The cohort was predominantly low-income, with 89% reporting annual household income below $50,000. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean pre-RT composite score was 31.1, with transportation challenges and mixed perceptions of equitable care commonly reported. Post-RT, navigated patients reported more favorable accessibility, accommodation, and acceptability scores than nonnavigated patients, while affordability scores were similar. Complete appointment attendance was 92% with navigation versus 83% without navigation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation was associated with more favorable health care access experiences, though adherence differences were not statistically significant.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US), University School (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.