Assessment of Informed Consent Practices in Surgical Procedures at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Informed consent is an ethical and legal prerequisite for surgical care, yet its quality and comprehensibility vary widely across clinical settings. Factors such as communication barriers, limited patient understanding, and time constraints, especially in emergency surgeries, can compromise the consent process. This study assessed the quality of informed consent practices in major surgical departments of a tertiary care hospital in Northeast India and examined determinants of patient understanding and satisfaction. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 postoperative patients recruited consecutively from General Surgery, Orthopaedics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ENT, and Ophthalmology departments. Data were collected using a pre-validated Informed Consent Quality (ICF) checklist, a structured interview schedule, and a five-point satisfaction scale. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, independent t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of satisfaction, and multiple linear regressions to determine predictors of ICF quality. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean ICF Quality Score was 7.8 ± 1.9, and the mean Satisfaction Score was 4.1 ± 0.8. Elective surgeries showed significantly higher ICF quality and satisfaction than emergency procedures (p < 0.05). Time spent on consent (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), patient awareness (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), and understanding (β = 0.22, p < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors of ICF quality. Satisfaction was significantly associated with higher ICF scores, local language use, and adequate discussion of complications. Emergency status remained a negative predictor in regression analysis. Conclusion: Effective communication, adequate time allocation, and use of local language substantially improve the ethical quality of surgical informed consent. Structured templates and AETCOM-based training may strengthen consent practices in Indian teaching hospitals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-08-03
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Informed Consent Practices in Surgical Procedures at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Abhik Sil, Nani Gopal Das, Papiya Paul, Nani Gopal Das
PubMed
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Assessment of Informed Consent Practices in Surgical Procedures at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Abhik Sil, Nani Gopal Das, Papiya Paul, Nani Gopal Das
article en

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is an ethical and legal prerequisite for surgical care, yet its quality and comprehensibility vary widely across clinical settings. Factors such as communication barriers, limited patient understanding, and time constraints, especially in emergency surgeries, can compromise the consent process. This study assessed the quality of informed consent practices in major surgical departments of a tertiary care hospital in Northeast India and examined determinants of patient understanding and satisfaction. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 postoperative patients recruited consecutively from General Surgery, Orthopaedics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ENT, and Ophthalmology departments. Data were collected using a pre-validated Informed Consent Quality (ICF) checklist, a structured interview schedule, and a five-point satisfaction scale. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, independent t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of satisfaction, and multiple linear regressions to determine predictors of ICF quality. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean ICF Quality Score was 7.8 ± 1.9, and the mean Satisfaction Score was 4.1 ± 0.8. Elective surgeries showed significantly higher ICF quality and satisfaction than emergency procedures (p < 0.05). Time spent on consent (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), patient awareness (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), and understanding (β = 0.22, p < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors of ICF quality. Satisfaction was significantly associated with higher ICF scores, local language use, and adequate discussion of complications. Emergency status remained a negative predictor in regression analysis. Conclusion: Effective communication, adequate time allocation, and use of local language substantially improve the ethical quality of surgical informed consent. Structured templates and AETCOM-based training may strengthen consent practices in Indian teaching hospitals.

PubMedVol. 67(1)
Tripura Medical College & Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Informed Consent Practices in Surgical Procedures at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India: A Cross-Sectional Study. — Abhik Sil, Nani Gopal Das, et al. · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS