Biomechanical Assessment of Graft-Augmented Fixation After Mandibular Advancement Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy

BACKGROUND: The success of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) depends on fixation stability, particularly in large mandibular advancements where conventional fixation methods may be insufficient and associated with lower border defects. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the stability of a graft-augmented fixation technique compared with conventional fixation methods for securing mandibular segments following the advancement of BSSO in cadaveric human mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty human hemimandibles underwent standardized sagittal split osteotomy with a 10 mm advancement and were stabilized using 3 bicortical screws, a single titanium plate with 4 screws, double titanium plates with 4 screws, or an allograft bone block combined with a single plate and 4 screws (experimental group). Nonoperated mandibles served as controls. The specimens were subjected to 3-point bending tests to evaluate their maximum load, flexural stress, load at maximum displacement, and modulus of elasticity. RESULTS: The graft-augmented fixation demonstrated a significantly higher mean maximum load (928±414 N) compared with three-screw fixation (331.5±131 N), single-plate fixation (389.9±144 N), double-plate fixation (490±173 N), and controls (310±15 N). Flexural stress was also markedly higher in the grafted group (P<0.002). CONCLUSION: Graft-augmented fixation significantly enhances biomechanical stability following mandibular advancement of BSSO and has the potential to decrease the risk of permanent lower border defects in larger advancement cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013221
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Assessment of Graft-Augmented Fixation After Mandibular Advancement Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy

Randa Alfotawi, Saud M. Alotaibi, Mohammed A. Kharif, Mazen Alomayri et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Biomechanical Assessment of Graft-Augmented Fixation After Mandibular Advancement Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy

Randa Alfotawi, Saud M. Alotaibi, Mohammed A. Kharif, Mazen Alomayri, Ibrahim A. Alqahtani, Khalid W. Alrashed
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) depends on fixation stability, particularly in large mandibular advancements where conventional fixation methods may be insufficient and associated with lower border defects. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the stability of a graft-augmented fixation technique compared with conventional fixation methods for securing mandibular segments following the advancement of BSSO in cadaveric human mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty human hemimandibles underwent standardized sagittal split osteotomy with a 10 mm advancement and were stabilized using 3 bicortical screws, a single titanium plate with 4 screws, double titanium plates with 4 screws, or an allograft bone block combined with a single plate and 4 screws (experimental group). Nonoperated mandibles served as controls. The specimens were subjected to 3-point bending tests to evaluate their maximum load, flexural stress, load at maximum displacement, and modulus of elasticity. RESULTS: The graft-augmented fixation demonstrated a significantly higher mean maximum load (928±414 N) compared with three-screw fixation (331.5±131 N), single-plate fixation (389.9±144 N), double-plate fixation (490±173 N), and controls (310±15 N). Flexural stress was also markedly higher in the grafted group (P<0.002). CONCLUSION: Graft-augmented fixation significantly enhances biomechanical stability following mandibular advancement of BSSO and has the potential to decrease the risk of permanent lower border defects in larger advancement cases.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.