Can gender-fair language modify vocational representations? Assessing the impact of grammatical form and stereotypes on adolescents’ perceived warmth, perceived competence, and anticipated sense of belonging for different occupations

In recent years, the use of gender-fair language in grammatical gender languages like French has been increasingly encouraged to counteract cognitive biases that arise when the grammatical masculine is used as a generic. Yet little is known about how these language forms affect adolescents for whom vocational interests are still developing. Under this pretext, this study investigates how the use of grammatical masculine and pair forms to describe gender-stereotypical occupations influences adolescents' vocational representations. Across two preregistered experiments, French-speaking adolescents evaluated perceived warmth, perceived competence, and their anticipated sense of belonging to gender-stereotypical occupations presented in either the masculine or pair forms. Contrary to previous findings among adults, the pair form did not lead to more inclusive perceptions among adolescents. Instead, gender stereotypes associated with the occupation emerged as a primary source for gender representation, especially for girls. Importantly, the effects varied according to adolescents' gender and age. The implications are discussed in the context of gender-related beliefs and vocational representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354871
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can gender-fair language modify vocational representations? Assessing the impact of grammatical form and stereotypes on adolescents’ perceived warmth, perceived competence, and anticipated sense of belonging for different occupations

Pascal Gygax, Ute Gabriel, Lucie Escasain, Sayaka Sato et al.
PLoS ONE
Gender Studies in Language
article

Can gender-fair language modify vocational representations? Assessing the impact of grammatical form and stereotypes on adolescents’ perceived warmth, perceived competence, and anticipated sense of belonging for different occupations

Pascal Gygax, Ute Gabriel, Lucie Escasain, Sayaka Sato, Mégane Pittet, Jane Oakhill
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the use of gender-fair language in grammatical gender languages like French has been increasingly encouraged to counteract cognitive biases that arise when the grammatical masculine is used as a generic. Yet little is known about how these language forms affect adolescents for whom vocational interests are still developing. Under this pretext, this study investigates how the use of grammatical masculine and pair forms to describe gender-stereotypical occupations influences adolescents' vocational representations. Across two preregistered experiments, French-speaking adolescents evaluated perceived warmth, perceived competence, and their anticipated sense of belonging to gender-stereotypical occupations presented in either the masculine or pair forms. Contrary to previous findings among adults, the pair form did not lead to more inclusive perceptions among adolescents. Instead, gender stereotypes associated with the occupation emerged as a primary source for gender representation, especially for girls. Importantly, the effects varied according to adolescents' gender and age. The implications are discussed in the context of gender-related beliefs and vocational representations.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
University of Fribourg (CH), University of Sussex (GB), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.