A rubric to assess generative AI-based feedback on student writing assignments

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are an increasingly common resource used in the classroom and writing process. The landscape of available GenAI tools is rapidly evolving, so having a systematic and straightforward way to evaluate new tools for incorporation into the classroom is key. For example, in science writing education, GenAI tools can be used as a supplement to instructor feedback on student writing, allowing an additional opportunity for critique and revision by the student. Here, we describe a rubric we developed to enable instructors to assess differences between feedback provided by GenAI models based on five key areas: (i) accuracy, (ii) constructiveness, (iii) clarity and readability, (iv) recognition of strengths, and (v) original text. We show data comparing the feedback provided by multiple GenAI models on student work based on course guidelines. This rubric can serve as a resource for other instructors interested in evaluating various GenAI models for use as scientific writing feedback supplements in their own classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00350-25
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A rubric to assess generative AI-based feedback on student writing assignments

Rachael M. Barry, Daniel R. Rankins, Valerie T. La, Erick N. Tran et al.
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

A rubric to assess generative AI-based feedback on student writing assignments

Rachael M. Barry, Daniel R. Rankins, Valerie T. La, Erick N. Tran, Dorothy M. Huang
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are an increasingly common resource used in the classroom and writing process. The landscape of available GenAI tools is rapidly evolving, so having a systematic and straightforward way to evaluate new tools for incorporation into the classroom is key. For example, in science writing education, GenAI tools can be used as a supplement to instructor feedback on student writing, allowing an additional opportunity for critique and revision by the student. Here, we describe a rubric we developed to enable instructors to assess differences between feedback provided by GenAI models based on five key areas: (i) accuracy, (ii) constructiveness, (iii) clarity and readability, (iv) recognition of strengths, and (v) original text. We show data comparing the feedback provided by multiple GenAI models on student work based on course guidelines. This rubric can serve as a resource for other instructors interested in evaluating various GenAI models for use as scientific writing feedback supplements in their own classrooms.

Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
University of California, Irvine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.