Development and internal validation of an ICU mortality prediction model for patients with concurrent sepsis and heart failure: a retrospective cohort study based on eICU-CRD

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and heart failure are common critical conditions within the ICU, and their coexistence significantly increases the difficulty of patient management and mortality risk. This study aims to develop and validate a practical nomogram for predicting ICU mortality, thereby facilitating risk stratification and clinical decision-making for patients coded as having both sepsis and heart failure. METHODS: This study constitutes a retrospective cohort investigation. Patients meeting inclusion criteria for both sepsis and heart failure were identified via the eICU-CRD database, subsequently randomised in a 7:3 ratio to form training and validation cohorts. Variable selection employed the Least Absolute and Selective Operator (LASSO) regression, with nomogram analysis constructed. Model discriminatory ability was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was evaluated using calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Decision curves and clinical impact curves were plotted to evaluate the model's net benefit and clinical applicability. RESULTS: A total of 1,394 patients were included and divided into a training set (975 cases) and a validation set (419 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. The final model integrated eight independent predictors: mechanical ventilation, lactate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, age, platelet count, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation. The model demonstrated acceptable to good discriminatory performance in both training and validation cohorts (AUC 0.826 [95% CI 0.789-0.863] and 0.798 [95% CI 0.732-0.864], respectively), with good calibration (Brier scores: training cohort 0.090, validation cohort 0.091; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test P-values > 0.05), and demonstrated clear clinical net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and internally validated a predictive nomogram based on eight routine clinical variables for ICU mortality in patients coded for both sepsis and heart failure. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration. However, given the broad, code-based case definition and the lack of heart failure-specific variables, this tool should be reframed as an internally validated ICU mortality prediction model for this high-risk population, rather than as a cardiology-specific or clinically actionable nomogram. External validation is required before any clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-026-00323-2
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and internal validation of an ICU mortality prediction model for patients with concurrent sepsis and heart failure: a retrospective cohort study based on eICU-CRD

Suqi Lv, Dingchao Lv, He Huang, Xiaolan Wang et al.
Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Development and internal validation of an ICU mortality prediction model for patients with concurrent sepsis and heart failure: a retrospective cohort study based on eICU-CRD

Suqi Lv, Dingchao Lv, He Huang, Xiaolan Wang, Mao Ye
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and heart failure are common critical conditions within the ICU, and their coexistence significantly increases the difficulty of patient management and mortality risk. This study aims to develop and validate a practical nomogram for predicting ICU mortality, thereby facilitating risk stratification and clinical decision-making for patients coded as having both sepsis and heart failure. METHODS: This study constitutes a retrospective cohort investigation. Patients meeting inclusion criteria for both sepsis and heart failure were identified via the eICU-CRD database, subsequently randomised in a 7:3 ratio to form training and validation cohorts. Variable selection employed the Least Absolute and Selective Operator (LASSO) regression, with nomogram analysis constructed. Model discriminatory ability was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was evaluated using calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Decision curves and clinical impact curves were plotted to evaluate the model's net benefit and clinical applicability. RESULTS: A total of 1,394 patients were included and divided into a training set (975 cases) and a validation set (419 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. The final model integrated eight independent predictors: mechanical ventilation, lactate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, age, platelet count, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation. The model demonstrated acceptable to good discriminatory performance in both training and validation cohorts (AUC 0.826 [95% CI 0.789-0.863] and 0.798 [95% CI 0.732-0.864], respectively), with good calibration (Brier scores: training cohort 0.090, validation cohort 0.091; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test P-values > 0.05), and demonstrated clear clinical net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and internally validated a predictive nomogram based on eight routine clinical variables for ICU mortality in patients coded for both sepsis and heart failure. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration. However, given the broad, code-based case definition and the lack of heart failure-specific variables, this tool should be reframed as an internally validated ICU mortality prediction model for this high-risk population, rather than as a cardiology-specific or clinically actionable nomogram. External validation is required before any clinical application.

Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology ReportsVol. 12(1)
Changzhi University (CN), Changzhi Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.