The means of prediction and the production function of AI

Abstract Who gets to decide what AI systems optimize for? Current debates frame the risks of AI as a conflict between humans and machines. This brief argues instead that the central conflicts are between different groups of people, over the choice of the objectives that AI systems are built to maximize. Control over these objectives rests with those who control the inputs to AI, that is, the means of prediction: data, compute, expertise, and energy. To shed light on this control, I discuss the production function of AI, which maps data and compute into predictive performance, drawing on statistical learning theory and on the empirical scaling laws that have driven the industry’s costly scramble for scale and the resulting concentration of power. I then argue that market-based governance fails: individual property rights over data cannot address AI’s harms and benefits, because machine learning is fundamentally about data externalities, and because platform network effects are artificially maintained. I conclude with proposals for democratic control of the means of prediction, through institutions such as sortition and liquid democracy, to give those affected by algorithmic decisions a say over the objectives that AI pursues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-026-00491-5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The means of prediction and the production function of AI

Maximilian Kasy
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The means of prediction and the production function of AI

Maximilian Kasy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Who gets to decide what AI systems optimize for? Current debates frame the risks of AI as a conflict between humans and machines. This brief argues instead that the central conflicts are between different groups of people, over the choice of the objectives that AI systems are built to maximize. Control over these objectives rests with those who control the inputs to AI, that is, the means of prediction: data, compute, expertise, and energy. To shed light on this control, I discuss the production function of AI, which maps data and compute into predictive performance, drawing on statistical learning theory and on the empirical scaling laws that have driven the industry’s costly scramble for scale and the resulting concentration of power. I then argue that market-based governance fails: individual property rights over data cannot address AI’s harms and benefits, because machine learning is fundamentally about data externalities, and because platform network effects are artificially maintained. I conclude with proposals for democratic control of the means of prediction, through institutions such as sortition and liquid democracy, to give those affected by algorithmic decisions a say over the objectives that AI pursues.

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
University of Oxford (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.