Reliability and Repeatability of At-Home Parent-Reported Height and Weight Measurement of Young Children
Accurate anthropometric measurement is essential for monitoring child growth, yet access to in-person measurement collection can be limited. This study examines the reliability and repeatability of height and weight measurements taken at home by a single parent compared to those taken by a trained researcher team in a clinical setting. Thirty children aged 2-5 years enrolled in the TARGet Kids! cohort were measured by two trained researchers working in a pair and by their parent at home using standardized instructions. Technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM (%TEM), and the coefficient of reliability (R) were used to assess measurement reliability. Results demonstrated high reliability and repeatability of parent-reported measurements, particularly for weight. Bland-Altman plots showed slightly greater variation in height measurements collected by the parent at home, though still within acceptable limits. These findings support the use of parent-collected anthropometry at home, which may enhance accessibility for research and clinical care when in-person measurement is not feasible.
Authors
- Sarah Rae (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7025-3658)
- Frank Ong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-8683)
- Cindy‐Lee Dennis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7242)
- Catherine S. Birken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-8645)
- Charles Keown-Stoneman
- Jonathon Maguire
- Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Jill Hamilton
Institutions
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Health Solutions (Sweden) (SE)
- Public Health Ontario (CA)
- Centre for Global Health Research (CA)
- St Michael’s Hospital (GB)
- SickKids Foundation (CA)
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Childhood Obesity
- Published
- 2026-08-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/21532176261474683
- Primary Topic
- Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00