A Conceptual Framework of Work-System Resilience Enablers for Technology Development

Humans are often the main source of resilience in work systems, responding to surprise events and variety in demands with resourcefulness, initiative, and flexibility that technologies generally lack. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence and automation technologies increasingly are developed to perform macrocognitive work such as planning and decision making in healthcare, transportation, national security, and other high-consequence domains. When developed without consideration for ways this work is performed to assure work system resilience, new technology risks compromising that resilience. We propose a conceptual framework of work system resilience, Transform with Resilience during Upgrades to Socio-Technical Systems (TRUSTS), that translates resilience concepts into work system requirements for technology development teams to consider. We developed TRUSTS in three phases: baseline framework development, specialization for technology development, and iterative refinement. We position the proposed framework relative to four influential bodies of research, describe early applications in technology development, and identify challenges and research needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434261470484
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Framework of Work-System Resilience Enablers for Technology Development

Stephen L. Dorton, Douglas Owen, Kelly Neville, Emily S. Patterson et al.
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

A Conceptual Framework of Work-System Resilience Enablers for Technology Development

Stephen L. Dorton, Douglas Owen, Kelly Neville, Emily S. Patterson, Jennifer Winner, Emily Barrett, Glenn Lematta
article en

Abstract

Humans are often the main source of resilience in work systems, responding to surprise events and variety in demands with resourcefulness, initiative, and flexibility that technologies generally lack. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence and automation technologies increasingly are developed to perform macrocognitive work such as planning and decision making in healthcare, transportation, national security, and other high-consequence domains. When developed without consideration for ways this work is performed to assure work system resilience, new technology risks compromising that resilience. We propose a conceptual framework of work system resilience, Transform with Resilience during Upgrades to Socio-Technical Systems (TRUSTS), that translates resilience concepts into work system requirements for technology development teams to consider. We developed TRUSTS in three phases: baseline framework development, specialization for technology development, and iterative refinement. We position the proposed framework relative to four influential bodies of research, describe early applications in technology development, and identify challenges and research needs.

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Abisko Scientific Research Station (SE), Kotka Maritime Research Centre (FI), 59th Medical Wing (US), Mitre (United States) (US), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.