Beyond Archetype: From Industrial Design to Biodesign in the Age of Artificial and Biological Intelligence

Abstract Biodesign is often framed as an extension of industrial design through biological materials, processes, or aesthetics. This paper argues instead that biodesign represents a fundamental, epistemic, and civilizational shift, comparable in magnitude to the Industrial Revolution that shaped industrial design and its pedagogy. Drawing on Alexander Manus conception of the designer as a cognitive agent, the paper reframes design as the structuring of meaning and relationships rather than the production of objects. As artificial intelligence and biological intelligence increasingly converge, the designers role shifts from innovator to co-evolver: a mediator of adaptive systems operating across temporal and ecological scales. Situating biodesign within an emerging biotechnical revolution, the paper critiques industrial archetypes in design education and proposes a post-archetypal pedagogical framework grounded in systems thinking, more-than-human ethics, and planetary cognition. Biodesign thus emerges not as a style, but as the design paradigm of a biotechnical age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Directions Biotechnology Design
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s2977905726100936
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Archetype: From Industrial Design to Biodesign in the Age of Artificial and Biological Intelligence

C. Fernandes, Y. Michel
Research Directions Biotechnology Design
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Beyond Archetype: From Industrial Design to Biodesign in the Age of Artificial and Biological Intelligence

C. Fernandes, Y. Michel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Biodesign is often framed as an extension of industrial design through biological materials, processes, or aesthetics. This paper argues instead that biodesign represents a fundamental, epistemic, and civilizational shift, comparable in magnitude to the Industrial Revolution that shaped industrial design and its pedagogy. Drawing on Alexander Manus conception of the designer as a cognitive agent, the paper reframes design as the structuring of meaning and relationships rather than the production of objects. As artificial intelligence and biological intelligence increasingly converge, the designers role shifts from innovator to co-evolver: a mediator of adaptive systems operating across temporal and ecological scales. Situating biodesign within an emerging biotechnical revolution, the paper critiques industrial archetypes in design education and proposes a post-archetypal pedagogical framework grounded in systems thinking, more-than-human ethics, and planetary cognition. Biodesign thus emerges not as a style, but as the design paradigm of a biotechnical age.

Research Directions Biotechnology Design
Yamato University (JP), Kairos (United States) (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.