Justice-Related Cognitive Styles, Daily Injustices, and Social Functioning in Resettled Refugees

Abstract Purpose Refugees are often exposed to injustice across the displacement journey, leading to persistent difficulties in social functioning. It is important to understand environmental and psychological factors driving processes like trust and cooperation to inform efforts to improve social functioning. In this study, we investigated whether cognitive styles and daily injustices were relevant factors influencing trust and cooperation in refugees. Methods Participants were 102 refugees from Arabic- and Farsi-speaking backgrounds resettled in Australia. Participants completed a self-report measure of justice-related cognitive styles (specifically victim and perpetrator sensitivity) and then were randomly allocated to one of two conditions where they were primed with an audio scenario representing daily injustices (unjust condition), or a neutral audio scenario (neutral condition). Participants then completed behavioural tasks to index interpersonal trust (Trust Game) and cooperation (Ultimatum Game). Results Multiple regression analyses indicated that justice-related cognitive styles predicted trust behaviour. Specifically, victim sensitivity predicted lower trust behaviour, while perpetrator sensitivity predicted greater trust behaviour. Being primed with a daily injustice predicted reduced cooperation behaviour. There were no significant interactions between being primed with injustice and justice-related cognitive styles. Conclusions These results highlight the relevance of justice-related constructs for adaptive social functioning in refugees. This includes experimental evidence for the differential influence of cognitive styles and daily injustices on trust and cooperation. The findings raise important implications for resettlement programming and clinical practice as they suggest both internal (e.g., cognitive styles) and external factors (e.g., experiences of injustice) should be targeted to support refugee wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-026-10773-8
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice-Related Cognitive Styles, Daily Injustices, and Social Functioning in Resettled Refugees

Vivian Mai, Angela Nickerson, Belinda Liddell
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Justice-Related Cognitive Styles, Daily Injustices, and Social Functioning in Resettled Refugees

Vivian Mai, Angela Nickerson, Belinda Liddell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Refugees are often exposed to injustice across the displacement journey, leading to persistent difficulties in social functioning. It is important to understand environmental and psychological factors driving processes like trust and cooperation to inform efforts to improve social functioning. In this study, we investigated whether cognitive styles and daily injustices were relevant factors influencing trust and cooperation in refugees. Methods Participants were 102 refugees from Arabic- and Farsi-speaking backgrounds resettled in Australia. Participants completed a self-report measure of justice-related cognitive styles (specifically victim and perpetrator sensitivity) and then were randomly allocated to one of two conditions where they were primed with an audio scenario representing daily injustices (unjust condition), or a neutral audio scenario (neutral condition). Participants then completed behavioural tasks to index interpersonal trust (Trust Game) and cooperation (Ultimatum Game). Results Multiple regression analyses indicated that justice-related cognitive styles predicted trust behaviour. Specifically, victim sensitivity predicted lower trust behaviour, while perpetrator sensitivity predicted greater trust behaviour. Being primed with a daily injustice predicted reduced cooperation behaviour. There were no significant interactions between being primed with injustice and justice-related cognitive styles. Conclusions These results highlight the relevance of justice-related constructs for adaptive social functioning in refugees. This includes experimental evidence for the differential influence of cognitive styles and daily injustices on trust and cooperation. The findings raise important implications for resettlement programming and clinical practice as they suggest both internal (e.g., cognitive styles) and external factors (e.g., experiences of injustice) should be targeted to support refugee wellbeing.

Cognitive Therapy and Research
UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
University of New South Wales
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.