A progressive augmented reality framework for learning Arduino through physical and digital interaction

Augmented Reality (AR) has shown potential to support STEM education by connecting abstract concepts with hands-on practice. However, existing research on AR for learning electronics, particularly Arduino platforms, often lacks comparisons with other interactive digital approaches and tends to rely on simulated rather than real physical components. To address these gaps, this study proposes a progressive AR-based learning framework that integrates real Arduino hardware with three sequential learning modes (Exploration, Practice, and Assembly), grounded in scaffolding, experiential learning, and cognitive load theories. A comparative experimental study was conducted with 47 participants assigned to either an AR-based condition or an equivalent web-based interactive condition. Pre- and post-tests measured knowledge gains in component identification, structural understanding, and basic procedural circuit knowledge. The AR group showed statistically significant within-group improvement ( \(t = -3.603\) , \(p = 0.0015\) , \(d = 0.735\) ), while the web-based group showed marginal improvement that did not reach significance ( \(p = 0.0512\) , \(d = 0.430\) ). Critically, direct comparison of gain scores between groups revealed no significant difference ( \(p = 0.4083\) , Cohen’s \(d = 0.244\) ). Thus, although AR produced significant learning gains within the group, it did not statistically outperform the web-based interactive alternative. User perceptions (SAMR-based questionnaire, \(n = 17\) ) were highly positive regarding utility and motivation (94.1% agreement), although neutral responses on items related to deeper conceptual understanding suggest that perceived benefits were stronger for engagement, motivation, and visualization than for higher-order conceptual learning. Qualitative feedback indicated that participants perceived the system as helpful for visualizing components and accessing component information more intuitively. Overall, the findings suggest that AR can serve as a valuable complementary tool in electronics education when embedded in a theory-informed instructional design, although the present study does not provide evidence of superior learning effectiveness compared with a well-designed interactive web-based alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-64557-x
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A progressive augmented reality framework for learning Arduino through physical and digital interaction

Águeda Gómez-Cambronero, Inmaculada Remolar, Anna Tonda, Linda García Rytman
Scientific Reports
Augmented Reality Applications
article

A progressive augmented reality framework for learning Arduino through physical and digital interaction

Águeda Gómez-Cambronero, Inmaculada Remolar, Anna Tonda, Linda García Rytman
article en

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) has shown potential to support STEM education by connecting abstract concepts with hands-on practice. However, existing research on AR for learning electronics, particularly Arduino platforms, often lacks comparisons with other interactive digital approaches and tends to rely on simulated rather than real physical components. To address these gaps, this study proposes a progressive AR-based learning framework that integrates real Arduino hardware with three sequential learning modes (Exploration, Practice, and Assembly), grounded in scaffolding, experiential learning, and cognitive load theories. A comparative experimental study was conducted with 47 participants assigned to either an AR-based condition or an equivalent web-based interactive condition. Pre- and post-tests measured knowledge gains in component identification, structural understanding, and basic procedural circuit knowledge. The AR group showed statistically significant within-group improvement ( \(t = -3.603\) , \(p = 0.0015\) , \(d = 0.735\) ), while the web-based group showed marginal improvement that did not reach significance ( \(p = 0.0512\) , \(d = 0.430\) ). Critically, direct comparison of gain scores between groups revealed no significant difference ( \(p = 0.4083\) , Cohen’s \(d = 0.244\) ). Thus, although AR produced significant learning gains within the group, it did not statistically outperform the web-based interactive alternative. User perceptions (SAMR-based questionnaire, \(n = 17\) ) were highly positive regarding utility and motivation (94.1% agreement), although neutral responses on items related to deeper conceptual understanding suggest that perceived benefits were stronger for engagement, motivation, and visualization than for higher-order conceptual learning. Qualitative feedback indicated that participants perceived the system as helpful for visualizing components and accessing component information more intuitively. Overall, the findings suggest that AR can serve as a valuable complementary tool in electronics education when embedded in a theory-informed instructional design, although the present study does not provide evidence of superior learning effectiveness compared with a well-designed interactive web-based alternative.

Scientific Reports
Universitat Jaume I (ES)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.