The elicitation of quality of life preferences for lung cancer treatment from the perspective of patients and treating physicians: results of two discrete choice experiments

PURPOSE: Maintaining or improving the health-related quality of life (QoL) of lung cancer patients is essential throughout treatment. To support shared decision-making and improve patient-physician communication, patients' preferences should be understood and considered in clinical decision-making; however, existing research indicates notable discrepancies between patient and physician priorities. This study therefore aims to elicit and compare their preferences regarding QoL dimensions in lung cancer care in Germany. METHODS: Based on systematic literature reviews as well as qualitative analysis, two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were applied to elicit the preferences of patients and treating physicians. In the DCE scenarios, both groups chose between alternative QoL profiles reflecting different health states during lung cancer treatment. Data were analyzed using multinomial logit models. RESULTS: The final DCEs comprised five common attributes - activities of daily living, shortness of breath, anxiety, social life, and emotional impairment - and one group-specific attribute: financial difficulties in the patient DCE and severity of pain in the physician DCE. Overall, 162 patients (mean age: 60.39 years, SD 10.05) and 154 referring physicians (mean age: 51.26 years, SD 11.28) participated. All model coefficients were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Patients prioritized "Shortness of breath" (28.0%; level range of 1.417) and "Activities of daily living" (23.8%; level range of 1.207), while "Emotional impairment" (6.4%; level range of 0.323) ranked lowest. In contrast, treating physicians emphasized ''Shortness of breath" (26.0%; level range of 1.114) and "Severity of pain" (22.5%; level range of 0.962); again, "Emotional impairment" ranked lowest (4.8%; level range of 0.207). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients and treating physicians showed broad agreement regarding the importance of several central QoL dimensions, particularly shortness of breath and activities of daily living. At the same time, differences in the weighting of selected attributes suggest that individual QoL priorities should be addressed explicitly in patient-physician communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01979-4
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The elicitation of quality of life preferences for lung cancer treatment from the perspective of patients and treating physicians: results of two discrete choice experiments

Brunhilde Steinger, Stefan Rohrbacher, Ksenia Ibler, Martin Emmert et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics
Cancer survivorship and care
article

The elicitation of quality of life preferences for lung cancer treatment from the perspective of patients and treating physicians: results of two discrete choice experiments

Brunhilde Steinger, Stefan Rohrbacher, Ksenia Ibler, Martin Emmert, Monika Klinkhammer‐Schalke, Vinzenz Völkel, Sophie Friebel, Marie Ringlein, Michael Koller, Florian Gürtler-Daiß, Jacqueline Müller‑Nordhorn
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Maintaining or improving the health-related quality of life (QoL) of lung cancer patients is essential throughout treatment. To support shared decision-making and improve patient-physician communication, patients' preferences should be understood and considered in clinical decision-making; however, existing research indicates notable discrepancies between patient and physician priorities. This study therefore aims to elicit and compare their preferences regarding QoL dimensions in lung cancer care in Germany. METHODS: Based on systematic literature reviews as well as qualitative analysis, two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were applied to elicit the preferences of patients and treating physicians. In the DCE scenarios, both groups chose between alternative QoL profiles reflecting different health states during lung cancer treatment. Data were analyzed using multinomial logit models. RESULTS: The final DCEs comprised five common attributes - activities of daily living, shortness of breath, anxiety, social life, and emotional impairment - and one group-specific attribute: financial difficulties in the patient DCE and severity of pain in the physician DCE. Overall, 162 patients (mean age: 60.39 years, SD 10.05) and 154 referring physicians (mean age: 51.26 years, SD 11.28) participated. All model coefficients were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Patients prioritized "Shortness of breath" (28.0%; level range of 1.417) and "Activities of daily living" (23.8%; level range of 1.207), while "Emotional impairment" (6.4%; level range of 0.323) ranked lowest. In contrast, treating physicians emphasized ''Shortness of breath" (26.0%; level range of 1.114) and "Severity of pain" (22.5%; level range of 0.962); again, "Emotional impairment" ranked lowest (4.8%; level range of 0.207). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients and treating physicians showed broad agreement regarding the importance of several central QoL dimensions, particularly shortness of breath and activities of daily living. At the same time, differences in the weighting of selected attributes suggest that individual QoL priorities should be addressed explicitly in patient-physician communication.

The European Journal of Health Economics
University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Health and Safety Authority (IE), University of Bayreuth (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Universität Bayreuth
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.