Perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral responses of Arab audiences to AI-labeled news: an experimental study grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract Purpose Empirical evidence on how news audiences actually perceive and respond to AI-labeled news is still scarce. The present study bridges this research gap by applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the underexplored domain of generative AI in news production. It investigates the key factors that shape audience attitudes toward using generative AI in news production, namely Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Generative AI’s Awareness/literacy. It also examines how formed attitudes influence perceptions of trustworthiness and sharing intention of AI-labeled news items. Design/methodology/approach The work depends on a randomized between-subjects online experiment with pre-exposure measures and post-exposure outcomes on a purposive sample of Arab social media users ( n = 420). Findings The results showed that perceived usefulness and ease of use are key drivers of audience attitudes. However, it remains unclear what shapes these perceptions, as the hypothesised correlation with generative AI awareness was only partially supported. Additionally, while AI labeling was found to enhance trust in news, it does not directly translate to a higher intention to share AI-labeled news items. Practical implications We provide actionable insights for news organizations seeking to integrate generative AI tools while maintaining news transparency and audience trust. Furthermore, by uncovering the ethical concerns that shape audiences’ negative attitudes, we pave the way for developing strategies to address these concerns and foster more informed audiences. Social implications The study underscores the potential of news transparency through AI labeling in fostering trust yet highlights the complexities surrounding audience willingness to engage with AI-labeled news items, as concerns about misinformation, bias, and threats to news integrity remain significant barriers. These concerns point to a potential skepticism that hinders the broader acceptance of integrating generative AI in news production, which implies that news transparency must be backed up with strict ethical guidelines to foster greater acceptance among news audiences. Originality/value The work is among the earliest to apply the Technology Acceptance Model to the underexplored domain of AI-labeled news, especially from a non-Western audience perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Media and Global Communication
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2025-0097
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral responses of Arab audiences to AI-labeled news: an experimental study grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model

Menna Elhosary, RASHA ABDULLA
Online Media and Global Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral responses of Arab audiences to AI-labeled news: an experimental study grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model

Menna Elhosary, RASHA ABDULLA
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Empirical evidence on how news audiences actually perceive and respond to AI-labeled news is still scarce. The present study bridges this research gap by applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the underexplored domain of generative AI in news production. It investigates the key factors that shape audience attitudes toward using generative AI in news production, namely Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Generative AI’s Awareness/literacy. It also examines how formed attitudes influence perceptions of trustworthiness and sharing intention of AI-labeled news items. Design/methodology/approach The work depends on a randomized between-subjects online experiment with pre-exposure measures and post-exposure outcomes on a purposive sample of Arab social media users ( n = 420). Findings The results showed that perceived usefulness and ease of use are key drivers of audience attitudes. However, it remains unclear what shapes these perceptions, as the hypothesised correlation with generative AI awareness was only partially supported. Additionally, while AI labeling was found to enhance trust in news, it does not directly translate to a higher intention to share AI-labeled news items. Practical implications We provide actionable insights for news organizations seeking to integrate generative AI tools while maintaining news transparency and audience trust. Furthermore, by uncovering the ethical concerns that shape audiences’ negative attitudes, we pave the way for developing strategies to address these concerns and foster more informed audiences. Social implications The study underscores the potential of news transparency through AI labeling in fostering trust yet highlights the complexities surrounding audience willingness to engage with AI-labeled news items, as concerns about misinformation, bias, and threats to news integrity remain significant barriers. These concerns point to a potential skepticism that hinders the broader acceptance of integrating generative AI in news production, which implies that news transparency must be backed up with strict ethical guidelines to foster greater acceptance among news audiences. Originality/value The work is among the earliest to apply the Technology Acceptance Model to the underexplored domain of AI-labeled news, especially from a non-Western audience perspective.

Online Media and Global Communication
St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), American University in Cairo (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.