Sex differences in life-course social disadvantage and all-cause mortality: evidence from a longitudinal study from 1996 to 2023

BACKGROUND: Social inequalities in mortality persist in Germany despite high universal health coverage. Yet no study has simultaneously examined sex-specific differences in accumulation, age modification, and life-stage variation in the association between social disadvantage and all-cause mortality across the adult life-course. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal life-course study using 28 years of data from the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP; 1996-2023), comprising 112,006 adults and 660,480 person-wave observations. Low socioeconomic status (low-SES), an indicator of social disadvantage, was measured as the number of years spent in the lowest 20% of a composite SES index of education, occupation, and income. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate (1) accumulation, (2) age-modification, and (3) life-stage variation in the social disadvantage-mortality association for women and men. Results are reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over 684,295 person-years of follow-up, 4,974 deaths occurred. Cumulative social disadvantage was associated with higher mortality risk for both sexes. Among women, each additional year spent in social disadvantage at age 50 was associated with a 13% higher mortality hazard (HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.19). The accumulation gradient was steeper among men (15%; interaction HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04). The age-modification model indicated that the strength of the social disadvantage-mortality association attenuated with age, but more gradually for men than for women. In the life-stage model, stronger associations were observed in emerging adulthood for women (ages 16-29: HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.71) and in mid-adulthood (ages 45-64: HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1 .03-1.24) and late adulthood ( ages 65 + : HR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.00-1.29) among men. CONCLUSION/OUTLOOK: An accumulation of social disadvantage increases mortality hazard for both sexes, but is higher for men. Association decreases with age, strongest in emerging adulthood for women and mid-to-late adulthood for men. These findings underscore the importance of life-course-informed and gender-responsive public health actions to reduce persistent social inequalities in mortality in Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28773-4
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in life-course social disadvantage and all-cause mortality: evidence from a longitudinal study from 1996 to 2023

Daniel Tarekegn Worede, Alfons Hollederer
BMC Public Health
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Sex differences in life-course social disadvantage and all-cause mortality: evidence from a longitudinal study from 1996 to 2023

Daniel Tarekegn Worede, Alfons Hollederer
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social inequalities in mortality persist in Germany despite high universal health coverage. Yet no study has simultaneously examined sex-specific differences in accumulation, age modification, and life-stage variation in the association between social disadvantage and all-cause mortality across the adult life-course. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal life-course study using 28 years of data from the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP; 1996-2023), comprising 112,006 adults and 660,480 person-wave observations. Low socioeconomic status (low-SES), an indicator of social disadvantage, was measured as the number of years spent in the lowest 20% of a composite SES index of education, occupation, and income. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate (1) accumulation, (2) age-modification, and (3) life-stage variation in the social disadvantage-mortality association for women and men. Results are reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over 684,295 person-years of follow-up, 4,974 deaths occurred. Cumulative social disadvantage was associated with higher mortality risk for both sexes. Among women, each additional year spent in social disadvantage at age 50 was associated with a 13% higher mortality hazard (HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.19). The accumulation gradient was steeper among men (15%; interaction HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04). The age-modification model indicated that the strength of the social disadvantage-mortality association attenuated with age, but more gradually for men than for women. In the life-stage model, stronger associations were observed in emerging adulthood for women (ages 16-29: HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.71) and in mid-adulthood (ages 45-64: HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1 .03-1.24) and late adulthood ( ages 65 + : HR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.00-1.29) among men. CONCLUSION/OUTLOOK: An accumulation of social disadvantage increases mortality hazard for both sexes, but is higher for men. Association decreases with age, strongest in emerging adulthood for women and mid-to-late adulthood for men. These findings underscore the importance of life-course-informed and gender-responsive public health actions to reduce persistent social inequalities in mortality in Germany.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
University of Kassel (DE)
Universität Kassel
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.