Causal Uncertainty-Decomposed Ensemble Learning for Confounding-Aware Skin Cancer Detection in Dermoscopic Images

Background/Objectives: Automated dermoscopic image analysis can assist research on early skin cancer detection, but deep learning models may learn acquisition-related shortcuts, including terminal hairs, illumination gradients, gel bubbles, shadows and measurement markings. This study evaluates a causal uncertainty-decomposed ensemble (CUDE) for confounding-aware skin-lesion classification within the ISIC 2019 benchmark setting. Methods: CUDE uses a structured variational autoencoder (SVAE) to impose separate lesion-relevant and acquisition-related nuisance latent heads. Three stochastic latent-space experts are trained on complementary streams and are integrated by a Dirichlet-based fusion module trained with nuisance sampling. The causal graph is used as a modeling prior rather than proof of causal identification. Results: Using a stratified internal split of the labeled ISIC 2019 training collection, CUDE achieved a balanced accuracy of 89.7% and an AUROC of 0.972. Under the predefined synthetic artifact protocol, CUDE showed a relative performance drop of 5.0%, compared with 9.6% for the deep ensemble. Deferring the 10% most uncertain cases increased non-deferred accuracy from 89.7% to 93.2% and reduced false-negative rates for melanoma, BCC and SCC in the non-deferred subset. Conclusions: Within the evaluated ISIC 2019 split and controlled synthetic corruption protocol, structured latent separation, stochastic expert diversity and Dirichlet fusion were associated with improved benchmark robustness and calibration. These results should not be interpreted as evidence of broad real-world robustness or clinical deployment readiness; external multi-center, device-diverse and skin-tone-diverse validation remains required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152453
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal Uncertainty-Decomposed Ensemble Learning for Confounding-Aware Skin Cancer Detection in Dermoscopic Images

Khurshid Ahmad, Mohd. Faheem Khan
Diagnostics
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Causal Uncertainty-Decomposed Ensemble Learning for Confounding-Aware Skin Cancer Detection in Dermoscopic Images

Khurshid Ahmad, Mohd. Faheem Khan
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Automated dermoscopic image analysis can assist research on early skin cancer detection, but deep learning models may learn acquisition-related shortcuts, including terminal hairs, illumination gradients, gel bubbles, shadows and measurement markings. This study evaluates a causal uncertainty-decomposed ensemble (CUDE) for confounding-aware skin-lesion classification within the ISIC 2019 benchmark setting. Methods: CUDE uses a structured variational autoencoder (SVAE) to impose separate lesion-relevant and acquisition-related nuisance latent heads. Three stochastic latent-space experts are trained on complementary streams and are integrated by a Dirichlet-based fusion module trained with nuisance sampling. The causal graph is used as a modeling prior rather than proof of causal identification. Results: Using a stratified internal split of the labeled ISIC 2019 training collection, CUDE achieved a balanced accuracy of 89.7% and an AUROC of 0.972. Under the predefined synthetic artifact protocol, CUDE showed a relative performance drop of 5.0%, compared with 9.6% for the deep ensemble. Deferring the 10% most uncertain cases increased non-deferred accuracy from 89.7% to 93.2% and reduced false-negative rates for melanoma, BCC and SCC in the non-deferred subset. Conclusions: Within the evaluated ISIC 2019 split and controlled synthetic corruption protocol, structured latent separation, stochastic expert diversity and Dirichlet fusion were associated with improved benchmark robustness and calibration. These results should not be interpreted as evidence of broad real-world robustness or clinical deployment readiness; external multi-center, device-diverse and skin-tone-diverse validation remains required.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
M.J.P. Rohilkhand University (IN), Qassim University (SA)
Qassim University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.