Development of a relative molar sensitivity–based HPLC method for quantifying acetaminophen, two beta-lactams, amiodarone, and its metabolite

Abstract Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges and high pharmacokinetic variability. However, significant barriers hinder TDM implementation. Outsourcing of testing can delay timely clinical decision-making, with possible delays of up to 1 week. Additionally, management of analyte-specific certified reference material (CRM) presents substantial operational challenges, particularly for unstable compounds. The present study therefore developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method based on relative molar sensitivity (RMS) of stable non-analyte reference materials (carbamazepine and caffeine) to quantify five clinically important analytes—acetaminophen, two beta-lactam antibiotics (cefmetazole and cefazolin), and amiodarone and its active metabolite, N -desethylamiodarone. Methods RMS values were calculated as the ratio of the analyte and non-analyte reference material calibration curve slopes. CRM solutions were used at 6 to 10 concentrations per analyte. HPLC analysis utilized analyte-specific detection wavelengths in the range 240–275 nm. For validation, control serum samples were spiked at 2 or 3 concentrations per analyte and processed via spin-column solid-phase extraction. Quantitative accuracy was assessed by comparing the RMS-based results with conventional absolute calibration methods. Results All calibration curves demonstrated excellent linearity, with correlation coefficients in the range 0.9993–1.0000. Calibration curve slope reproducibility was high, with relative standard deviations of 0.3%–1.5% ( n = 3). Quantitative analyses of spiked serum samples showed close agreement between the RMS and conventional methods, with relative differences not exceeding ± 0.50% for either calibrant for any analyte. Both methods achieved comparable precision, with relative standard deviations of < 4.6%. Conclusions The validated RMS-based HPLC method provides accurate and precise quantification of structurally diverse drugs using stable, the International System of Units (SI)-traceable, non-analyte reference materials. This approach eliminates the need for analyte-specific authentic standards for routine analyses, thus substantially reducing procurement costs and addressing the instability of some analytes. The rapid and accurate analysis enables timely reporting, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes through expedited in-house TDM implementation in hospital laboratories with limited resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-026-00615-w
Primary Topic
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a relative molar sensitivity–based HPLC method for quantifying acetaminophen, two beta-lactams, amiodarone, and its metabolite

Takashi Ohtsuki, Satoru Morikawa, Hiroshi Matsufuji, Miyuki Matsushita et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
article

Development of a relative molar sensitivity–based HPLC method for quantifying acetaminophen, two beta-lactams, amiodarone, and its metabolite

Takashi Ohtsuki, Satoru Morikawa, Hiroshi Matsufuji, Miyuki Matsushita, Makoto Hashimoto, Yume Enomoto, Risa Imai, Nonoka Seto, Akane Yasuda
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges and high pharmacokinetic variability. However, significant barriers hinder TDM implementation. Outsourcing of testing can delay timely clinical decision-making, with possible delays of up to 1 week. Additionally, management of analyte-specific certified reference material (CRM) presents substantial operational challenges, particularly for unstable compounds. The present study therefore developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method based on relative molar sensitivity (RMS) of stable non-analyte reference materials (carbamazepine and caffeine) to quantify five clinically important analytes—acetaminophen, two beta-lactam antibiotics (cefmetazole and cefazolin), and amiodarone and its active metabolite, N -desethylamiodarone. Methods RMS values were calculated as the ratio of the analyte and non-analyte reference material calibration curve slopes. CRM solutions were used at 6 to 10 concentrations per analyte. HPLC analysis utilized analyte-specific detection wavelengths in the range 240–275 nm. For validation, control serum samples were spiked at 2 or 3 concentrations per analyte and processed via spin-column solid-phase extraction. Quantitative accuracy was assessed by comparing the RMS-based results with conventional absolute calibration methods. Results All calibration curves demonstrated excellent linearity, with correlation coefficients in the range 0.9993–1.0000. Calibration curve slope reproducibility was high, with relative standard deviations of 0.3%–1.5% ( n = 3). Quantitative analyses of spiked serum samples showed close agreement between the RMS and conventional methods, with relative differences not exceeding ± 0.50% for either calibrant for any analyte. Both methods achieved comparable precision, with relative standard deviations of < 4.6%. Conclusions The validated RMS-based HPLC method provides accurate and precise quantification of structurally diverse drugs using stable, the International System of Units (SI)-traceable, non-analyte reference materials. This approach eliminates the need for analyte-specific authentic standards for routine analyses, thus substantially reducing procurement costs and addressing the instability of some analytes. The rapid and accurate analysis enables timely reporting, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes through expedited in-house TDM implementation in hospital laboratories with limited resources.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Nihon University (JP), Toranomon Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.