Optimization of processing costs could improve the cost-competitiveness of lithium extraction from clay relative to conventional sources of brines and hard rock ores

Lithium is a critical material for current and future battery technologies. Commercial production primarily relies on hard rock deposits (e.g., in Australia, China, Zimbabwe) and brines (e.g., in Chile, Argentina). This study evaluates the economic viability of lithium extraction from clay, the third largest lithium resource globally, by analyzing seven proposed projects employing three different extraction technologies: Hydrochloric acid leaching, sulfuric acid leaching, and sulfate salt roasting. We benchmark levelized production costs for clay extraction against global brine and hard rock extraction operations and projects (4996-5580 USD t−1 LCE). Our findings indicate that clay-based lithium extraction can be between 20% and 100% more expensive than global averages, depending on extraction technology and process flow (6429-10,875 USD t−1 LCE). However, we propose pathways that can improve cost-competitiveness relative to conventional sources by up to 50%. We emphasize that these are modeled optimization pathways derived from feasibility-stage data and have not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. Lithium from clay currently costs 20–100% more than brine or hard rock, but reductions in reagent, power, and capital costs could narrow the gap, according to process-level cost modeling of seven feasibility-stage projects across three extraction routes. Primary Handling Editors: I-Yun Hsieh and Alireza Bahadori.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03845-w
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of processing costs could improve the cost-competitiveness of lithium extraction from clay relative to conventional sources of brines and hard rock ores

Andrew Z. Haddad, Thomas P. Hendrickson, Jannis Wesselkaemper, Prakash Rao et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Optimization of processing costs could improve the cost-competitiveness of lithium extraction from clay relative to conventional sources of brines and hard rock ores

Andrew Z. Haddad, Thomas P. Hendrickson, Jannis Wesselkaemper, Prakash Rao, Sarah J. Smith
article en

Abstract

Lithium is a critical material for current and future battery technologies. Commercial production primarily relies on hard rock deposits (e.g., in Australia, China, Zimbabwe) and brines (e.g., in Chile, Argentina). This study evaluates the economic viability of lithium extraction from clay, the third largest lithium resource globally, by analyzing seven proposed projects employing three different extraction technologies: Hydrochloric acid leaching, sulfuric acid leaching, and sulfate salt roasting. We benchmark levelized production costs for clay extraction against global brine and hard rock extraction operations and projects (4996-5580 USD t−1 LCE). Our findings indicate that clay-based lithium extraction can be between 20% and 100% more expensive than global averages, depending on extraction technology and process flow (6429-10,875 USD t−1 LCE). However, we propose pathways that can improve cost-competitiveness relative to conventional sources by up to 50%. We emphasize that these are modeled optimization pathways derived from feasibility-stage data and have not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. Lithium from clay currently costs 20–100% more than brine or hard rock, but reductions in reagent, power, and capital costs could narrow the gap, according to process-level cost modeling of seven feasibility-stage projects across three extraction routes. Primary Handling Editors: I-Yun Hsieh and Alireza Bahadori.

Communications Earth & Environment
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.