Price Stability, Financial Stability and Central Bank Effectiveness: A Common‐Agency Perspective

ABSTRACT This article considers the institutional design of monetary policy and the trade‐offs faced by central banks when they try to tackle both price and financial stability at the same time. The complementarity between monetary and macroprudential policies has been highlighted in terms of objectives and operational implementation, the ‘divine coincidence’. Nevertheless, the assignment of both mandates to the same institution has not remained unchallenged. While the literature typically assumes homogeneous preferences of the public/society, in this article we introduce agency considerations, reflecting heterogeneous preferences of policymakers and the public. We adopt a common‐agency framework, accounting for formal central bank mandates along with external pressure on monetary policy, to analyse under which conditions it is optimal to assign price and financial stability mandates to one or two separate institutions. Our results show that the ability to achieve a set of given monetary and financial stability targets does not depend on the number of tasks an institution is assigned, but on the degree of independence of the institution itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70275
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Price Stability, Financial Stability and Central Bank Effectiveness: A Common‐Agency Perspective

Georgios Chortareas, Riccardo Russo
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Price Stability, Financial Stability and Central Bank Effectiveness: A Common‐Agency Perspective

Georgios Chortareas, Riccardo Russo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article considers the institutional design of monetary policy and the trade‐offs faced by central banks when they try to tackle both price and financial stability at the same time. The complementarity between monetary and macroprudential policies has been highlighted in terms of objectives and operational implementation, the ‘divine coincidence’. Nevertheless, the assignment of both mandates to the same institution has not remained unchallenged. While the literature typically assumes homogeneous preferences of the public/society, in this article we introduce agency considerations, reflecting heterogeneous preferences of policymakers and the public. We adopt a common‐agency framework, accounting for formal central bank mandates along with external pressure on monetary policy, to analyse under which conditions it is optimal to assign price and financial stability mandates to one or two separate institutions. Our results show that the ability to achieve a set of given monetary and financial stability targets does not depend on the number of tasks an institution is assigned, but on the degree of independence of the institution itself.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
King's College London (GB), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), King's College School (GB), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.