Pathways to energy‑efficient in‑space additive manufacturing

Energy‑efficient in‑space additive manufacturing (iAM) will be a deciding factor in whether long‑duration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond can move from demonstration to sustained operation. In our view, simply transplanting terrestrial AM processes into the resource‑constrained, power‑limited, and harsh environments of space is unlikely to succeed without a fundamental rethinking of how energy, materials, and process design are coupled. This perspective discusses how emerging low‑power AM approaches can be tailored to meet the requirements of microgravity and extraterrestrial surfaces, alongside in situ energy harvesting and utilization concepts intended to lessen dependence on Earth‑supplied power, and energy‑efficient remanufacturing pathways that enable closed‑loop use of space materials. By qualitatively comparing these directions with respect to energy demand, technology readiness, and integration potential, we highlight critical gaps and argue for a shift toward autonomous, energy‑aware in‑space AM systems. We hope these viewpoints will help steer future research toward resilient, mission‑ready manufacturing capabilities that can underpin truly sustainable space exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRS Communications
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-026-01017-7
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways to energy‑efficient in‑space additive manufacturing

Prashant Dhakal, Shiren Wang, Xiaofei Wu, Jae Gwang Kim et al.
MRS Communications
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Pathways to energy‑efficient in‑space additive manufacturing

Prashant Dhakal, Shiren Wang, Xiaofei Wu, Jae Gwang Kim, Kwan‐Soo Lee, Jihyeon Kim, Yunchong Yang, Jingjing Qiu, Aolin Hou
article en

Abstract

Energy‑efficient in‑space additive manufacturing (iAM) will be a deciding factor in whether long‑duration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond can move from demonstration to sustained operation. In our view, simply transplanting terrestrial AM processes into the resource‑constrained, power‑limited, and harsh environments of space is unlikely to succeed without a fundamental rethinking of how energy, materials, and process design are coupled. This perspective discusses how emerging low‑power AM approaches can be tailored to meet the requirements of microgravity and extraterrestrial surfaces, alongside in situ energy harvesting and utilization concepts intended to lessen dependence on Earth‑supplied power, and energy‑efficient remanufacturing pathways that enable closed‑loop use of space materials. By qualitatively comparing these directions with respect to energy demand, technology readiness, and integration potential, we highlight critical gaps and argue for a shift toward autonomous, energy‑aware in‑space AM systems. We hope these viewpoints will help steer future research toward resilient, mission‑ready manufacturing capabilities that can underpin truly sustainable space exploration.

MRS Communications
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.