Clinical and economic impact on people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States: a matched-cohort study

Objectives To understand the real-world clinical and economic impact of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United States (US).Methods This retrospective, matched-cohort study used a large, integrated US administrative health database from 01 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. People with RRMS (PwRRMS) were identified using a validated algorithm or through electronic health records and matched 1:1 to MS-free controls based on age, gender, race, region, and insurance. Demographics, comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs (HCCs) were compared between the RRMS cohort and MS-free controls during 1-year follow-up. All costs were reported in 2021 US dollars.Results The final cohort comprised 9,290 people (RRMS, n = 4,645; MS-free controls, n = 4,645) with a mean ± SD age of 52.9 ± 14.4 years; 79.1% were female. During the follow-up period, compared with the controls, the RRMS cohort had significantly higher prevalence of infections (60.9% vs. 51.5%; p < 0.001) and MS-related comorbidities, including malaise/fatigue (34.3% vs. 15.7%), major depressive disorders (27.6% vs. 17.7%), anxiety (21.4% vs. 15.1%), burning/numbness (19.4% vs. 5.8%), and abnormal gait (16.1% vs. 5.2%) (all p < 0.001). RRMS was associated with significantly higher mortality (5.0% vs. 1.2%), hospitalizations (18.2% vs. 11.5%), emergency department visits (40.3% vs. 28.1%), and physician visits (13.7 vs. 10.0) (all p < 0.001) versus controls. Mean total HCCs were significantly higher for RRMS versus controls ($54,244 vs. $19,671; p < 0.001), driven primarily by medical claims ($31,154 vs. $15,944; p < 0.001).Conclusions PwRRMS experienced a greater impact of comorbidities and significantly increased HCRU and HCCs, highlighting the need to integrate these impacts into everyday clinical decision‑making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2709407
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and economic impact on people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States: a matched-cohort study

Marian H. Tarbox, Ines Hemim, Keiko Higuchi, Nupur Greene et al.
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Clinical and economic impact on people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States: a matched-cohort study

Marian H. Tarbox, Ines Hemim, Keiko Higuchi, Nupur Greene, Ashis K. Das, Eunice Chang
article en

Abstract

Objectives To understand the real-world clinical and economic impact of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United States (US).Methods This retrospective, matched-cohort study used a large, integrated US administrative health database from 01 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. People with RRMS (PwRRMS) were identified using a validated algorithm or through electronic health records and matched 1:1 to MS-free controls based on age, gender, race, region, and insurance. Demographics, comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs (HCCs) were compared between the RRMS cohort and MS-free controls during 1-year follow-up. All costs were reported in 2021 US dollars.Results The final cohort comprised 9,290 people (RRMS, n = 4,645; MS-free controls, n = 4,645) with a mean ± SD age of 52.9 ± 14.4 years; 79.1% were female. During the follow-up period, compared with the controls, the RRMS cohort had significantly higher prevalence of infections (60.9% vs. 51.5%; p < 0.001) and MS-related comorbidities, including malaise/fatigue (34.3% vs. 15.7%), major depressive disorders (27.6% vs. 17.7%), anxiety (21.4% vs. 15.1%), burning/numbness (19.4% vs. 5.8%), and abnormal gait (16.1% vs. 5.2%) (all p < 0.001). RRMS was associated with significantly higher mortality (5.0% vs. 1.2%), hospitalizations (18.2% vs. 11.5%), emergency department visits (40.3% vs. 28.1%), and physician visits (13.7 vs. 10.0) (all p < 0.001) versus controls. Mean total HCCs were significantly higher for RRMS versus controls ($54,244 vs. $19,671; p < 0.001), driven primarily by medical claims ($31,154 vs. $15,944; p < 0.001).Conclusions PwRRMS experienced a greater impact of comorbidities and significantly increased HCRU and HCCs, highlighting the need to integrate these impacts into everyday clinical decision‑making.

Current Medical Research and Opinion
Healthcentric Advisors (US)
Sanofi
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.