Self-Reported Dietary Carotenoid Intake and Skin Carotenoid Score Status in a Geographically Diverse U.S. Sample

Background: The reflection spectroscopy (RS)-based skin carotenoid score (SCS) has been validated to assess carotenoid intake. However, associations between the SCS and individual dietary carotenoid species have been inconsistently reported in the previous literature. This study examined the utility of using a carotenoid screener along with RS to assess individual dietary carotenoid species intake among U.S. adults. Methods: Adults (N = 280) from eight U.S. sites completed a 44-item carotenoid intake screener to estimate total and individual dietary carotenoid intake (α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein + zeaxanthin, and lycopene) over the past 7 days. Each participant’s SCS was measured using two Veggie Meter® devices. Spearman’s Rank correlation tests and linear mixed models with a random intercept for site were conducted. Results: Mean (± Standard Deviations) carotenoid intake ranged from 21,226.8 ± 9914.1 to 28,863.5 ± 22,462.2 µg/day, and mean SCS ranged from 229.2 ± 72.3 to 325.6 ± 94.1 across the eight sites. Participants’ SCS was significantly associated with self-reported total carotenoids (mg)/week (rs = 0.2 and B = 0.11; p < 0.01) and with all individual carotenoids (rs ranged from 0.15 to 0.23, p < 0.01; B ranged from 0.11 to 21.1, p < 0.01), except lycopene. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that combining the carotenoid intake screener with RS may offer a practical approach for assessing individual carotenoid species intake in adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18152515
Primary Topic
Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Reported Dietary Carotenoid Intake and Skin Carotenoid Score Status in a Geographically Diverse U.S. Sample

Shanon Casperson, Emily Lynn, Susan B. Sisson, Virginia C. Stage et al.
Nutrients
Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
article

Self-Reported Dietary Carotenoid Intake and Skin Carotenoid Score Status in a Geographically Diverse U.S. Sample

Shanon Casperson, Emily Lynn, Susan B. Sisson, Virginia C. Stage, Ashlea C. Braun, Saima Hasnin, Jonathan Baldwin, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Taren Massey Swindle, Justin D. Dvorak
article en

Abstract

Background: The reflection spectroscopy (RS)-based skin carotenoid score (SCS) has been validated to assess carotenoid intake. However, associations between the SCS and individual dietary carotenoid species have been inconsistently reported in the previous literature. This study examined the utility of using a carotenoid screener along with RS to assess individual dietary carotenoid species intake among U.S. adults. Methods: Adults (N = 280) from eight U.S. sites completed a 44-item carotenoid intake screener to estimate total and individual dietary carotenoid intake (α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein + zeaxanthin, and lycopene) over the past 7 days. Each participant’s SCS was measured using two Veggie Meter® devices. Spearman’s Rank correlation tests and linear mixed models with a random intercept for site were conducted. Results: Mean (± Standard Deviations) carotenoid intake ranged from 21,226.8 ± 9914.1 to 28,863.5 ± 22,462.2 µg/day, and mean SCS ranged from 229.2 ± 72.3 to 325.6 ± 94.1 across the eight sites. Participants’ SCS was significantly associated with self-reported total carotenoids (mg)/week (rs = 0.2 and B = 0.11; p < 0.01) and with all individual carotenoids (rs ranged from 0.15 to 0.23, p < 0.01; B ranged from 0.11 to 21.1, p < 0.01), except lycopene. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that combining the carotenoid intake screener with RS may offer a practical approach for assessing individual carotenoid species intake in adults.

NutrientsVol. 18(15)
Oklahoma State University (US), Arkansas Children's Hospital (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), East Carolina University (US), University of Oklahoma Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital of Oklahoma (US), Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center (US), Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center (US), Children's Specialized Hospital (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, North Carolina State University, East Carolina University, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.