Two‐Stage Neural Network for Modeling Ductile Fracture in Structural Steel

ABSTRACT This study presents a data‐driven surrogate to the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) fracture model, designed as an uncoupled formulation for computationally efficient prediction of ductile fracture initiation under high triaxiality in structural steels. Although the GTN model is widely used to simulate void nucleation, growth, and coalescence in metals, its coupled nature incurs significant computational overhead, limiting its applicability to finite element simulations of steel structures. To address this challenge, we propose a two‐stage artificial neural network (TS‐ANN) trained on 49,875 single‐element GTN simulations generated by varying six micromechanical parameters: initial void volume fraction, void nucleation volume fraction, nucleation strain, nucleation strain standard deviation, stress triaxiality, and void volume fraction at fracture. The TS‐ANN architecture decouples the material parameter mapping and stress‐state dependence into two subnetworks: Subnet‐1, a larger network evaluated once per analysis, and Subnet‐2, a compact network with only 25 parameters, evaluated at each integration point. The model achieves a mean absolute error of 0.00143 and predicts failure strain within 5% of GTN results for over 99% of the data points. When implemented in ABAQUS as an uncoupled fracture criterion, the proposed model predicts fracture displacement in ASTM A992 steel specimens with less than 5% deviation from GTN‐based results, while achieving a 35–95‐fold reduction in computational time. This approach enables accurate and scalable simulation of ductile fracture in structural‐scale systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70402
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two‐Stage Neural Network for Modeling Ductile Fracture in Structural Steel

Dharanidharan Arumugam, Ravi Kiran
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Two‐Stage Neural Network for Modeling Ductile Fracture in Structural Steel

Dharanidharan Arumugam, Ravi Kiran
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a data‐driven surrogate to the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) fracture model, designed as an uncoupled formulation for computationally efficient prediction of ductile fracture initiation under high triaxiality in structural steels. Although the GTN model is widely used to simulate void nucleation, growth, and coalescence in metals, its coupled nature incurs significant computational overhead, limiting its applicability to finite element simulations of steel structures. To address this challenge, we propose a two‐stage artificial neural network (TS‐ANN) trained on 49,875 single‐element GTN simulations generated by varying six micromechanical parameters: initial void volume fraction, void nucleation volume fraction, nucleation strain, nucleation strain standard deviation, stress triaxiality, and void volume fraction at fracture. The TS‐ANN architecture decouples the material parameter mapping and stress‐state dependence into two subnetworks: Subnet‐1, a larger network evaluated once per analysis, and Subnet‐2, a compact network with only 25 parameters, evaluated at each integration point. The model achieves a mean absolute error of 0.00143 and predicts failure strain within 5% of GTN results for over 99% of the data points. When implemented in ABAQUS as an uncoupled fracture criterion, the proposed model predicts fracture displacement in ASTM A992 steel specimens with less than 5% deviation from GTN‐based results, while achieving a 35–95‐fold reduction in computational time. This approach enables accurate and scalable simulation of ductile fracture in structural‐scale systems.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.