Hierarchies Within Hierarchies: How Race/Ethnicity and Skin Tone Contribute to Body Image Concerns for Men and Gender Diverse People Who Have Sex with Men

Abstract Body image discourse has historically excluded the experiences of men and gender diverse People of Colour who have sex with men (MPCSM). Across 805 Grindr users, we examined associations between race/ethnicity, skin tone, and body image variables for men and gender diverse people who have sex with men (MPSM). We found that MPCSM reported experiencing greater skin tone surveillance than White participants, but that other body image variables did not differ between races/ethnicities. Further, there was a curvilinear relationship between participant skin tone and actual-ideal skin tone discrepancy, whereby participants with extremely light or dark skin tones were most at-risk for skin tone dissatisfaction. These findings were complemented by the fact that MPCSM and participants with darker skin felt pressured (and were more likely) to skin lighten than their White and lighter-skinned counterparts, and vice versa for tanning. Taken together, these findings indicate that beauty standards pertaining to skin tones exist for MPSM in Western cultures. Specifically, they suggest that tanned/bronzed skin is revered for White men and gender diverse people, while lighter ‘caramel’ skin is idealised for MPCSM (i.e., there are hierarchies within hierarchies). Findings elucidate the need for additional body image research focusing on the unique experiences of MPCSM, including examinations of the intersecting impact of racial/ethnic identity and skin tone on body image.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-026-10615-5
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchies Within Hierarchies: How Race/Ethnicity and Skin Tone Contribute to Body Image Concerns for Men and Gender Diverse People Who Have Sex with Men

Sarah Bonell, Scott Griffiths
Sexuality & Culture
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Hierarchies Within Hierarchies: How Race/Ethnicity and Skin Tone Contribute to Body Image Concerns for Men and Gender Diverse People Who Have Sex with Men

Sarah Bonell, Scott Griffiths
article en

Abstract

Abstract Body image discourse has historically excluded the experiences of men and gender diverse People of Colour who have sex with men (MPCSM). Across 805 Grindr users, we examined associations between race/ethnicity, skin tone, and body image variables for men and gender diverse people who have sex with men (MPSM). We found that MPCSM reported experiencing greater skin tone surveillance than White participants, but that other body image variables did not differ between races/ethnicities. Further, there was a curvilinear relationship between participant skin tone and actual-ideal skin tone discrepancy, whereby participants with extremely light or dark skin tones were most at-risk for skin tone dissatisfaction. These findings were complemented by the fact that MPCSM and participants with darker skin felt pressured (and were more likely) to skin lighten than their White and lighter-skinned counterparts, and vice versa for tanning. Taken together, these findings indicate that beauty standards pertaining to skin tones exist for MPSM in Western cultures. Specifically, they suggest that tanned/bronzed skin is revered for White men and gender diverse people, while lighter ‘caramel’ skin is idealised for MPCSM (i.e., there are hierarchies within hierarchies). Findings elucidate the need for additional body image research focusing on the unique experiences of MPCSM, including examinations of the intersecting impact of racial/ethnic identity and skin tone on body image.

Sexuality & Culture
The University of Melbourne (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.