Reasoning About Competence in Early Childhood: What Children Say and What They Think

Children routinely claim that they know and can do things that lie far outside their mental and physical capabilities. To adults, this unwarranted overconfidence may suggest a disconnect from reality, which could lead to missed learning opportunities or even risky behavior. Drawing on research in cognitive development, this article paints a more nuanced picture: Compared to what children say, what children do (e.g., asking for help, seeking information when uncertain) and how they react (e.g., showing surprise when achieving an unlikely outcome) reveals a more realistic understanding of their knowledge and abilities than their words let on. We discuss relevant empirical evidence and potential reasons behind this striking divergence and close with three broad considerations for stakeholders including (but not limited to) caregivers, educators, and policymakers: (1) what children say about their own competence may not always match what they think ; (2) early education that fosters lifelong learning should be not just about “getting the right answer” but also about understanding one's own competence and limitations; (3) evidence-based educational practices and policy require continued collaboration and exchange between scientists and early childhood stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322261472749
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reasoning About Competence in Early Childhood: What Children Say and What They Think

Hyowon Gweon, Antonia Langenhoff, Adani B. Abutto
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Reasoning About Competence in Early Childhood: What Children Say and What They Think

Hyowon Gweon, Antonia Langenhoff, Adani B. Abutto
article en

Abstract

Children routinely claim that they know and can do things that lie far outside their mental and physical capabilities. To adults, this unwarranted overconfidence may suggest a disconnect from reality, which could lead to missed learning opportunities or even risky behavior. Drawing on research in cognitive development, this article paints a more nuanced picture: Compared to what children say, what children do (e.g., asking for help, seeking information when uncertain) and how they react (e.g., showing surprise when achieving an unlikely outcome) reveals a more realistic understanding of their knowledge and abilities than their words let on. We discuss relevant empirical evidence and potential reasons behind this striking divergence and close with three broad considerations for stakeholders including (but not limited to) caregivers, educators, and policymakers: (1) what children say about their own competence may not always match what they think ; (2) early education that fosters lifelong learning should be not just about “getting the right answer” but also about understanding one's own competence and limitations; (3) evidence-based educational practices and policy require continued collaboration and exchange between scientists and early childhood stakeholders.

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.