Developing and applying a rubric to evaluate students’ conceptions of STEM careers

Background Conceptions regarding science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers are essential for students’ career choices. However, there is a lack of evaluation studies and instruments regarding how students understand the nature of STEM careers.Purpose This study has two goals: 1) To evaluate elementary students’ conceptions of scientists, engineers, and technologists as STEM careers using the newly developed and validated Draw-STEM-Professionals-at-Work rubric; and 2) To explore whether students’ conceptions of STEM careers differ according to gender and in relation to extensive STEM experiences.Sample 257 fourth-grade students participated in the survey investigation.Design and methods Each participant completed three drawings and written descriptions regarding scientists, engineers, and technologists respectively. Multiple coders were involved in the evaluation process and established the trustworthiness of the newly developed Draw-STEM-Professionals-at-Work rubric. Subsequently, analysis of variance and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to examine group differences.Results Results highlighted students’ relatively lower levels of conceptions of engineers and technologists, compared to scientists and poorer awareness of how engineering or science can be used in STEM careers, compared to how mathematics and technology can be applied. Moreover, STEM fair participants had more advanced levels of conceptions of engineers compared to non-participants.Conclusion The developed rubric is reliable and valid, which can be used for future studies involving students’ conceptions of STEM careers. The results of the study emphasize the need to modify and enhance students’ conceptions of engineers and how engineering and science can be applied in STEM professionals’ work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science & Technological Education
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2026.2709511
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and applying a rubric to evaluate students’ conceptions of STEM careers

Wing Mui Winnie So, Yingzhi Zhang, Tian Luo, Qi Huang
Research in Science & Technological Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Developing and applying a rubric to evaluate students’ conceptions of STEM careers

Wing Mui Winnie So, Yingzhi Zhang, Tian Luo, Qi Huang
article en

Abstract

Background Conceptions regarding science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers are essential for students’ career choices. However, there is a lack of evaluation studies and instruments regarding how students understand the nature of STEM careers.Purpose This study has two goals: 1) To evaluate elementary students’ conceptions of scientists, engineers, and technologists as STEM careers using the newly developed and validated Draw-STEM-Professionals-at-Work rubric; and 2) To explore whether students’ conceptions of STEM careers differ according to gender and in relation to extensive STEM experiences.Sample 257 fourth-grade students participated in the survey investigation.Design and methods Each participant completed three drawings and written descriptions regarding scientists, engineers, and technologists respectively. Multiple coders were involved in the evaluation process and established the trustworthiness of the newly developed Draw-STEM-Professionals-at-Work rubric. Subsequently, analysis of variance and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to examine group differences.Results Results highlighted students’ relatively lower levels of conceptions of engineers and technologists, compared to scientists and poorer awareness of how engineering or science can be used in STEM careers, compared to how mathematics and technology can be applied. Moreover, STEM fair participants had more advanced levels of conceptions of engineers compared to non-participants.Conclusion The developed rubric is reliable and valid, which can be used for future studies involving students’ conceptions of STEM careers. The results of the study emphasize the need to modify and enhance students’ conceptions of engineers and how engineering and science can be applied in STEM professionals’ work.

Research in Science & Technological Education
Beijing Normal University (CN), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Capital Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.