Waveform-Derived Metrics of Intracranial Compliance: Validation and Pulsatile Dynamics

Abstract Objective Visual interpretation of intracranial pressure (ICP) waveforms is widely used to assess intracranial compliance but lacks rigorous validation. We evaluated the pulse shape index (PSI) against the tidal wave (P2)/percussion wave (P1) ratio and examined the contributions of pulse amplitude, compensatory reserve [pressure–volume compensatory reserve index (RAP)] and transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived indices. Methods A total of 4388 non-overlapping 5-min segments from 96 high-resolution recordings of simultaneous ICP and TCD blood velocity were analysed. PSI and P2/P1 were derived from normalised ICP pulses. ICP pulse amplitude (AMP), RAP and TCD-derived arterial and intracranial compliance indices [arterial compliance (C A ), intracranial compliance (C I )] were calculated per segment. Associations were assessed at segment, recording, and patient levels using correlation and mixed-effects models. Discriminatory performance for impaired (P2/P1 > 1.1) and preserved (P2/P1 < 0.9) compliance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision–recall analyses. Concordance between PSI and P2/P1 classifications was assessed using Chi-squared threshold mapping. Results PSI demonstrated a strong association with P2/P1 ( r ≈ 0.74–0.76 across analysis levels) and high discrimination for impaired compliance [area under the curve (AUC) ≈ 0.93]. RAP and C I showed weak and inconsistent population-level associations with P2/P1, with substantial inter-individual variability. A distinct phenotype of low AMP (< 1.5 mm Hg) despite impaired waveform-derived compliance was associated with lower RAP. C A and C I provided limited incremental explanatory value, whereas inclusion of AMP improved model fit and classification performance beyond morphology-based metrics alone. Conclusions PSI closely reflects P2/P1 and supports automated waveform-based compliance assessment. However, morphology alone is insufficient; amplitude and reserve indices provide complementary information, supporting a multiparametric approach to intracranial monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocritical Care
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02620-1
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waveform-Derived Metrics of Intracranial Compliance: Validation and Pulsatile Dynamics

Ihsane Olakorede, Stefan Yu Bögli, Peter Smielewski, Marek Czosnyka
Neurocritical Care
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Waveform-Derived Metrics of Intracranial Compliance: Validation and Pulsatile Dynamics

Ihsane Olakorede, Stefan Yu Bögli, Peter Smielewski, Marek Czosnyka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Visual interpretation of intracranial pressure (ICP) waveforms is widely used to assess intracranial compliance but lacks rigorous validation. We evaluated the pulse shape index (PSI) against the tidal wave (P2)/percussion wave (P1) ratio and examined the contributions of pulse amplitude, compensatory reserve [pressure–volume compensatory reserve index (RAP)] and transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived indices. Methods A total of 4388 non-overlapping 5-min segments from 96 high-resolution recordings of simultaneous ICP and TCD blood velocity were analysed. PSI and P2/P1 were derived from normalised ICP pulses. ICP pulse amplitude (AMP), RAP and TCD-derived arterial and intracranial compliance indices [arterial compliance (C A ), intracranial compliance (C I )] were calculated per segment. Associations were assessed at segment, recording, and patient levels using correlation and mixed-effects models. Discriminatory performance for impaired (P2/P1 > 1.1) and preserved (P2/P1 < 0.9) compliance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision–recall analyses. Concordance between PSI and P2/P1 classifications was assessed using Chi-squared threshold mapping. Results PSI demonstrated a strong association with P2/P1 ( r ≈ 0.74–0.76 across analysis levels) and high discrimination for impaired compliance [area under the curve (AUC) ≈ 0.93]. RAP and C I showed weak and inconsistent population-level associations with P2/P1, with substantial inter-individual variability. A distinct phenotype of low AMP (< 1.5 mm Hg) despite impaired waveform-derived compliance was associated with lower RAP. C A and C I provided limited incremental explanatory value, whereas inclusion of AMP improved model fit and classification performance beyond morphology-based metrics alone. Conclusions PSI closely reflects P2/P1 and supports automated waveform-based compliance assessment. However, morphology alone is insufficient; amplitude and reserve indices provide complementary information, supporting a multiparametric approach to intracranial monitoring.

Neurocritical Care
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), University of Zurich (CH), University of Cambridge (GB), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
North Carolina Central University, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Politechnika Wrocławska
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.