Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia

ABSTRACT Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections, but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows because of their slow growth and frequent involvement in polymicrobial infections. We hypothesized that in polymicrobial bacteremia, rapidly growing organisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have sufficiently proliferated, potentially leading to underdetection during routine subculture. In this observational study, we evaluated whether re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles improves the detection of anaerobic bacteria. All blood samples were cultured using the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture system. Adult patients with at least one positive anaerobic blood culture bottle were included. Positive anaerobic bottles were subcultured using the conventional method and then re-incubated for an additional 4 days before repeat subculture to detect additional anaerobes. Species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, supplemented by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of 310 patients with positive anaerobic blood cultures, 29 (9.4%) had an additional 36 bacterial isolates identified after re-incubation, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Of 27 cases with two positive anaerobic bottles, additional organisms were detected in both bottles in 23 cases (85%), and concordant organisms were detected from the suspected infection focus in 9 cases (31%). Additional species identified following repeat incubation included Bacteroides fragilis , Veillonella parvula , Parvimonas micra , Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides , and Eggerthella lenta . This re-incubation approach provides microbiological evidence that slow-growing anaerobes may be underdetected in routine blood culture workflows for polymicrobial bloodstream infections. IMPORTANCE Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows. In polymicrobial infections, rapidly growing microorganisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have had adequate time to proliferate, leading to missed detection of slower-growing anaerobes during routine subculture. In this study, we re-incubated positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for an additional 4 days after they became positive to provide more time for slower-growing anaerobes to grow. This led to the detection of 36 additional bacterial isolates that would otherwise have remained undetected, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Some of these slow-growing microorganisms are rarely reported in bloodstream infections and some were concordant with anaerobic microorganisms isolated from the suspected infection focus. These findings provide microbiological evidence that slow-growing anaerobes may be underdetected in routine workflows for polymicrobial bloodstream infections, although prolonged turnaround time limits routine implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01551-26
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia

Kayoko Tadera, Hiroki Ohge, Kensuke Shimbara, Norifumi Shigemoto et al.
Microbiology Spectrum
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia

Kayoko Tadera, Hiroki Ohge, Kensuke Shimbara, Norifumi Shigemoto, Hiroki Kitagawa, Keitaro Omori, Yuta Kuhara, Shinya Takahashi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections, but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows because of their slow growth and frequent involvement in polymicrobial infections. We hypothesized that in polymicrobial bacteremia, rapidly growing organisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have sufficiently proliferated, potentially leading to underdetection during routine subculture. In this observational study, we evaluated whether re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles improves the detection of anaerobic bacteria. All blood samples were cultured using the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture system. Adult patients with at least one positive anaerobic blood culture bottle were included. Positive anaerobic bottles were subcultured using the conventional method and then re-incubated for an additional 4 days before repeat subculture to detect additional anaerobes. Species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, supplemented by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of 310 patients with positive anaerobic blood cultures, 29 (9.4%) had an additional 36 bacterial isolates identified after re-incubation, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Of 27 cases with two positive anaerobic bottles, additional organisms were detected in both bottles in 23 cases (85%), and concordant organisms were detected from the suspected infection focus in 9 cases (31%). Additional species identified following repeat incubation included Bacteroides fragilis , Veillonella parvula , Parvimonas micra , Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides , and Eggerthella lenta . This re-incubation approach provides microbiological evidence that slow-growing anaerobes may be underdetected in routine blood culture workflows for polymicrobial bloodstream infections. IMPORTANCE Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows. In polymicrobial infections, rapidly growing microorganisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have had adequate time to proliferate, leading to missed detection of slower-growing anaerobes during routine subculture. In this study, we re-incubated positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for an additional 4 days after they became positive to provide more time for slower-growing anaerobes to grow. This led to the detection of 36 additional bacterial isolates that would otherwise have remained undetected, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Some of these slow-growing microorganisms are rarely reported in bloodstream infections and some were concordant with anaerobic microorganisms isolated from the suspected infection focus. These findings provide microbiological evidence that slow-growing anaerobes may be underdetected in routine workflows for polymicrobial bloodstream infections, although prolonged turnaround time limits routine implementation.

Microbiology Spectrum
Hiroshima University (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.