Harvesting Ratings

Ratings play a crucial role in online marketplaces, shaping consumer decisions and firm strategies. We investigate how firms strategically use pricing to influence ratings, and how this undermines ratings as signals of product quality. We develop a two-period model of price competition between an established firm and a potentially high- or low-quality entrant, capturing the challenge high-quality newcomers face in building reputation. Consumers rate based on value-for-money, but cannot distinguish whether positive ratings result from genuine quality or discounted prices. Low-quality entrants take advantage of this and may offer low prices to harvest good ratings in the future, or mimic high prices to signal high quality. We show that ratings harvesting inflates positive ratings, reducing their informativeness. This exacerbates the cold-start problem and discourages high-quality entry. Our results mirror empirical patterns and generate implications for how rating design affects market outcomes: reducing effort costs to rate induces more but less-informative ratings, and discourages entry. Thus, actions by major marketplaces to encourage ratings could backfire and induce less precise ratings that discourage entry. To mitigate these effects, policymakers can consider balancing rating effort costs to preserve informativeness, discouraging excessive discounts for new sellers, and incorporating price paid into rating displays. Although the effects of individual entrants’ harvesting may appear temporary, harvesting hinders high-quality entrants from building reputation, discouraging entry and causing lasting distortions. This paper was accepted by Maria Guadalupe, business strategy. Funding: This work was supported by Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles [Grant 19/24-101 PROSEco], Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS [Grant FC46885], and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC TR 224 (Project B05), SSRC-SMU Graduate Research Fellowship). Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.06335 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.06335
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harvesting Ratings

Johannes Johnen, Robin Ng
Management Science
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Harvesting Ratings

Johannes Johnen, Robin Ng
article en

Abstract

Ratings play a crucial role in online marketplaces, shaping consumer decisions and firm strategies. We investigate how firms strategically use pricing to influence ratings, and how this undermines ratings as signals of product quality. We develop a two-period model of price competition between an established firm and a potentially high- or low-quality entrant, capturing the challenge high-quality newcomers face in building reputation. Consumers rate based on value-for-money, but cannot distinguish whether positive ratings result from genuine quality or discounted prices. Low-quality entrants take advantage of this and may offer low prices to harvest good ratings in the future, or mimic high prices to signal high quality. We show that ratings harvesting inflates positive ratings, reducing their informativeness. This exacerbates the cold-start problem and discourages high-quality entry. Our results mirror empirical patterns and generate implications for how rating design affects market outcomes: reducing effort costs to rate induces more but less-informative ratings, and discourages entry. Thus, actions by major marketplaces to encourage ratings could backfire and induce less precise ratings that discourage entry. To mitigate these effects, policymakers can consider balancing rating effort costs to preserve informativeness, discouraging excessive discounts for new sellers, and incorporating price paid into rating displays. Although the effects of individual entrants’ harvesting may appear temporary, harvesting hinders high-quality entrants from building reputation, discouraging entry and causing lasting distortions. This paper was accepted by Maria Guadalupe, business strategy. Funding: This work was supported by Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles [Grant 19/24-101 PROSEco], Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS [Grant FC46885], and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC TR 224 (Project B05), SSRC-SMU Graduate Research Fellowship). Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.06335 .

Management Science
University of Mannheim (DE), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.