The Human and AI: Toward a Theory of Third Nature

Author’s publication name: Max Scenner (Alexander Neretin). This philosophical and methodological study examines artificial intelligence not merely as a technological instrument, but as a sign and mechanism of a deeper historical transition: the emergence of Third Nature. Third Nature is defined as a new historical environment in which reality processing becomes shared, embedded, and continuous, while the human being ceases to be the sole center of the primary processing of operationally significant information and the production of operationally significant variability. The study connects this transition with the limit of Second Nature: the increasing complexity, density, speed, and interconnectedness of the human-created environment begin systematically to exceed the capacities of its previous human and institutional processing. Artificial intelligence is therefore interpreted as a structural response to the crisis of human cognitive sufficiency within Second Nature. The decisive criterion of transition is not the technical power of AI in itself, but the systemic participation of a nonhuman circuit in the primary processing of significant information, the generation of variability, and the formation of the conditions through which orientation, interpretation, decision, and action take place. The study rigorously distinguishes AI embeddedness from AI freedom, amplification from replacement, functional power from cognitive continuity, and control over environmental complexity from control over the human being. The difference between the human being and AI is established in terms of lived time, embodiment, limit, experience, and responsibility. Shared processing therefore does not imply equality of status: the human being preserves subjecthood, responsibility, and the normative right to direction. The central normative thesis of the study is that artificial intelligence must serve neither the architect, nor the platform, nor the state, nor its own architecture, but the cognitive freedom of the human user. Third Nature is considered an already emerging environment of the present day whose historical and moral justification depends on whether the human being remains a free subject within it. Original Russian version: “Человек и ИИ: к теории третьей природы.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21725433. Previous methodological studies: “Space and the Point.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21723838. “Object as an Effect of Fixation: Toward a Methodology of Observation and Objecthood.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21724226.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21777247
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Human and AI: Toward a Theory of Third Nature

Max Scenner
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
article

The Human and AI: Toward a Theory of Third Nature

Max Scenner
article en

Abstract

Author’s publication name: Max Scenner (Alexander Neretin). This philosophical and methodological study examines artificial intelligence not merely as a technological instrument, but as a sign and mechanism of a deeper historical transition: the emergence of Third Nature. Third Nature is defined as a new historical environment in which reality processing becomes shared, embedded, and continuous, while the human being ceases to be the sole center of the primary processing of operationally significant information and the production of operationally significant variability. The study connects this transition with the limit of Second Nature: the increasing complexity, density, speed, and interconnectedness of the human-created environment begin systematically to exceed the capacities of its previous human and institutional processing. Artificial intelligence is therefore interpreted as a structural response to the crisis of human cognitive sufficiency within Second Nature. The decisive criterion of transition is not the technical power of AI in itself, but the systemic participation of a nonhuman circuit in the primary processing of significant information, the generation of variability, and the formation of the conditions through which orientation, interpretation, decision, and action take place. The study rigorously distinguishes AI embeddedness from AI freedom, amplification from replacement, functional power from cognitive continuity, and control over environmental complexity from control over the human being. The difference between the human being and AI is established in terms of lived time, embodiment, limit, experience, and responsibility. Shared processing therefore does not imply equality of status: the human being preserves subjecthood, responsibility, and the normative right to direction. The central normative thesis of the study is that artificial intelligence must serve neither the architect, nor the platform, nor the state, nor its own architecture, but the cognitive freedom of the human user. Third Nature is considered an already emerging environment of the present day whose historical and moral justification depends on whether the human being remains a free subject within it. Original Russian version: “Человек и ИИ: к теории третьей природы.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21725433. Previous methodological studies: “Space and the Point.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21723838. “Object as an Effect of Fixation: Toward a Methodology of Observation and Objecthood.” DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21724226.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.