Comparing the effects of small, large, and two-tier signals on residency interview invitations

PURPOSE: Beginning in the 2023-2024 application cycle, specialties began to try out different approaches to program signaling. This study explores the effects of program signals in deciding whom to interview across small number signal (SNS), large number signal (LNS) and two-tier signal (2TS) approaches. METHOD: Of the 22 specialties that used signaling in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in the 2023-2024 cycle, dermatology, emergency medicine, general surgery, neurological surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopaedic surgery were analyzed as representative of the signaling approaches being studied. Data on signals, applicant type, passing USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK score, school and program state were collected from the MyERAS application; interview data was collected from ERAS PDWS and/or Thalamus. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between signals, other application data, and interview invitation. RESULTS: The presence of a signal increased interview likelihood regardless of approach. Applicants who signaled in SNS specialties observed a 4.7 to 7.4 times the odds of receiving interview offers compared to 8.4 to 18.5 times the odds in LNS, and up to 55 to 218 times the odds for gold signals in the 2TS approach. In-state status, applicant type, never failing Step 1, and Step 2 CK scores contributed to interview selection, though the effects were not as great as the signal contribution. The effect of signaling was stronger for out-of-state applicants. CONCLUSIONS: The authors report a strong association between signaling and the likelihood of an interview regardless of signaling method, though the effect was greatest with two-tier and large signal approaches. There was variation in the use of signals and the weight a program allocates to signals. Never having failed the Step 1 exam, state alignment, applicant type, and Step 2 CK scores were also associated with interview invitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Medicine
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/acamed/wvag206
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effects of small, large, and two-tier signals on residency interview invitations

Maya M. Hammoud, Dana M. Dunleavy, Brent Griffith, Alana J. Rosenblatt et al.
Academic Medicine
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Comparing the effects of small, large, and two-tier signals on residency interview invitations

Maya M. Hammoud, Dana M. Dunleavy, Brent Griffith, Alana J. Rosenblatt, S. Trent Guthrie, Alexis Pelletier‐Bui, Jennifer LaFemina, Aileen Dowden
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Beginning in the 2023-2024 application cycle, specialties began to try out different approaches to program signaling. This study explores the effects of program signals in deciding whom to interview across small number signal (SNS), large number signal (LNS) and two-tier signal (2TS) approaches. METHOD: Of the 22 specialties that used signaling in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in the 2023-2024 cycle, dermatology, emergency medicine, general surgery, neurological surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopaedic surgery were analyzed as representative of the signaling approaches being studied. Data on signals, applicant type, passing USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK score, school and program state were collected from the MyERAS application; interview data was collected from ERAS PDWS and/or Thalamus. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between signals, other application data, and interview invitation. RESULTS: The presence of a signal increased interview likelihood regardless of approach. Applicants who signaled in SNS specialties observed a 4.7 to 7.4 times the odds of receiving interview offers compared to 8.4 to 18.5 times the odds in LNS, and up to 55 to 218 times the odds for gold signals in the 2TS approach. In-state status, applicant type, never failing Step 1, and Step 2 CK scores contributed to interview selection, though the effects were not as great as the signal contribution. The effect of signaling was stronger for out-of-state applicants. CONCLUSIONS: The authors report a strong association between signaling and the likelihood of an interview regardless of signaling method, though the effect was greatest with two-tier and large signal approaches. There was variation in the use of signals and the weight a program allocates to signals. Never having failed the Step 1 exam, state alignment, applicant type, and Step 2 CK scores were also associated with interview invitation.

Academic Medicine
Association of American Medical Colleges (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Michigan (US), Cooper University Hospital (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), University of Chicago (US), Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.