Crosscurrents in Flood Planning and Insurance Discounts: What Drives Action?

The federal government created the Community Rating System (CRS) in 1990 to encourage local flood management. County and municipal governments can join the program to reduce flooding risk and enable residents to access discounts for flood insurance. We ask What is driving CRS program participation across counties over time? Analyzing three decades of panel data on county CRS uptake, we find overall low program uptake among counties with a floodplain (17 percent). More resourced counties, indicated by greater population and higher resident incomes, were 3 percent and 84 percent more likely to join the program, respectively, suggesting that lower-resource counties may need more support to implement CRS and similar programs. Counter to the growing partisanship in environmental policymaking, political party affiliation is not significantly associated with county CRS participation, suggesting that flood adaptation may cut across party lines in ways that current climate policy often does not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874261462078
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crosscurrents in Flood Planning and Insurance Discounts: What Drives Action?

Lidia Cano Pecharroman, Mark Brennan, Justin Steil, Savannah En
Urban Affairs Review
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Crosscurrents in Flood Planning and Insurance Discounts: What Drives Action?

Lidia Cano Pecharroman, Mark Brennan, Justin Steil, Savannah En
article en

Abstract

The federal government created the Community Rating System (CRS) in 1990 to encourage local flood management. County and municipal governments can join the program to reduce flooding risk and enable residents to access discounts for flood insurance. We ask What is driving CRS program participation across counties over time? Analyzing three decades of panel data on county CRS uptake, we find overall low program uptake among counties with a floodplain (17 percent). More resourced counties, indicated by greater population and higher resident incomes, were 3 percent and 84 percent more likely to join the program, respectively, suggesting that lower-resource counties may need more support to implement CRS and similar programs. Counter to the growing partisanship in environmental policymaking, political party affiliation is not significantly associated with county CRS participation, suggesting that flood adaptation may cut across party lines in ways that current climate policy often does not.

Urban Affairs Review
Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Martin Family Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.