The role of AI competencies: How do AI knowledge, skills, and attitudes shape users’ understanding and evaluation of explainable news recommendations?

This study investigates how explanations in AI-driven news recommender systems (RS) influence user understanding, trust, and attitudes toward the RS, and whether these effects depend on individual differences in AI competence. An online experiment ( N = 754) was conducted in the Netherlands with a no-explanation condition as baseline. Results show that joint explanations significantly improved users’ objective understanding of the RS but had no consistent direct effects on perceived understanding, trust, or attitudes toward the RS. Exploratory structural equation modeling revealed an indirect pathway in which explanations enhanced objective understanding, which increased perceived understanding, subsequently fostering greater trust and more positive attitudes. Moderation analyses showed limited evidence for AI competence conditioning explanation effects, with small benefits concentrated among users with higher AI knowledge. Together, these findings suggest that explanations in news RS are not universally effective: their effects appear to operate primarily through cognitive mechanisms, while competence-related differences remain limited and selective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261467983
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of AI competencies: How do AI knowledge, skills, and attitudes shape users’ understanding and evaluation of explainable news recommendations?

Sophie C. Boerman, Chuanji Wang, Claes H. de Vreese, Judith Möller et al.
New Media & Society
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

The role of AI competencies: How do AI knowledge, skills, and attitudes shape users’ understanding and evaluation of explainable news recommendations?

Sophie C. Boerman, Chuanji Wang, Claes H. de Vreese, Judith Möller, Anne C. Kroon
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how explanations in AI-driven news recommender systems (RS) influence user understanding, trust, and attitudes toward the RS, and whether these effects depend on individual differences in AI competence. An online experiment ( N = 754) was conducted in the Netherlands with a no-explanation condition as baseline. Results show that joint explanations significantly improved users’ objective understanding of the RS but had no consistent direct effects on perceived understanding, trust, or attitudes toward the RS. Exploratory structural equation modeling revealed an indirect pathway in which explanations enhanced objective understanding, which increased perceived understanding, subsequently fostering greater trust and more positive attitudes. Moderation analyses showed limited evidence for AI competence conditioning explanation effects, with small benefits concentrated among users with higher AI knowledge. Together, these findings suggest that explanations in news RS are not universally effective: their effects appear to operate primarily through cognitive mechanisms, while competence-related differences remain limited and selective.

New Media & Society
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hans-Bredow-Institute (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.