Survey: Six Years of Neural Differential Cryptanalysis

At CRYPTO 2019, A. Gohr introduced Neural Differential Cryptanalysis and used deep learning to improve the state of the art in cryptanalysis of 11-round SPECK32. As of February 2025, Gohr’s article has been cited 238 times on Google Scholar. The variety of targeted cryptographic primitives, techniques, settings, and evaluation methodologies that appear in these follow-up works provides a basis for a careful survey, which we provide in this paper. More specifically, we propose a taxonomy of these 238 publications and systematically review the 71 papers focusing on neural differential distinguishers, pointing out promising directions and recent advances in explainability and key-recovery attacks. We then highlight future challenges in the field, particularly the need for improved comparability of neural distinguishers and advancements in scaling. This holistic survey helps researchers and engineers to identify the leading neural differential attacks, compare their performance, and highlight the outstanding open problems in AI-assisted cryptanalysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62056/a69qxruc2
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey: Six Years of Neural Differential Cryptanalysis

Stjepan Picek, David Gérault, Moritz Huppert, Anna Hambitzer
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

Survey: Six Years of Neural Differential Cryptanalysis

Stjepan Picek, David Gérault, Moritz Huppert, Anna Hambitzer
article en

Abstract

At CRYPTO 2019, A. Gohr introduced Neural Differential Cryptanalysis and used deep learning to improve the state of the art in cryptanalysis of 11-round SPECK32. As of February 2025, Gohr’s article has been cited 238 times on Google Scholar. The variety of targeted cryptographic primitives, techniques, settings, and evaluation methodologies that appear in these follow-up works provides a basis for a careful survey, which we provide in this paper. More specifically, we propose a taxonomy of these 238 publications and systematically review the 71 papers focusing on neural differential distinguishers, pointing out promising directions and recent advances in explainability and key-recovery attacks. We then highlight future challenges in the field, particularly the need for improved comparability of neural distinguishers and advancements in scaling. This holistic survey helps researchers and engineers to identify the leading neural differential attacks, compare their performance, and highlight the outstanding open problems in AI-assisted cryptanalysis.

IACR Communications in CryptologyVol. 3(2)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Technology Innovation Institute (AE), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.