Checkpoint–checkpoint combinations in cancer: from mechanistic rationale to translational impact

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the treatment of several cancers, producing durable responses in a subset of patients. However, most individuals either fail to respond or eventually develop resistance. Tumor immune escape results from heterogeneous and often overlapping mechanisms, including impaired antigen presentation, limited T-cell infiltration, co-expression of multiple inhibitory receptors, and suppressive tumor microenvironmental signals. These limitations have driven the development of combination strategies aimed at restoring more effective and sustained antitumor immunity. Among combination approaches, dual immune checkpoint blockade represents the most established strategy. The combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors targets complementary phases of the immune response: early T-cell priming in lymphoid organs and effector function within the tumor microenvironment. Long-term clinical data across melanoma, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, and hepatocellular carcinoma support the ability of this approach to induce durable survival in a meaningful proportion of patients, albeit with increased immune-related toxicity. Building on this foundation, next-generation checkpoint combinations aim to counteract adaptive resistance and T-cell exhaustion. In particular, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT are frequently co-expressed with programmed death-1 on dysfunctional T cells. Emerging checkpoints such as VISTA, B7–H3, and BTLA further expand the landscape, particularly by modulating myeloid-driven suppression and advanced T-cell dysfunction. In parallel, bispecific antibodies integrating dual checkpoint targeting within a single molecule may enhance coordinated pathway inhibition and tumor localization. Immune checkpoint–based combinations represent an evolving strategy of immune restoration. Future advances will depend on biologically informed trial design, dynamic biomarkers, and rational optimization of dose and sequencing to maximize durable benefit while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08701-1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Checkpoint–checkpoint combinations in cancer: from mechanistic rationale to translational impact

Alessandro Mazzocca, Luigi Scarpato, Michele Iuliani, Silvia Cavaliere et al.
Journal of Translational Medicine
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Checkpoint–checkpoint combinations in cancer: from mechanistic rationale to translational impact

Alessandro Mazzocca, Luigi Scarpato, Michele Iuliani, Silvia Cavaliere, F. Pantano, Emanuele Claudio Mingo, S. Calagna, Agostina Lagodin D’Amato, Bruno Vincenzi, Alessio Cortellini, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giuseppe Tonini
article en

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the treatment of several cancers, producing durable responses in a subset of patients. However, most individuals either fail to respond or eventually develop resistance. Tumor immune escape results from heterogeneous and often overlapping mechanisms, including impaired antigen presentation, limited T-cell infiltration, co-expression of multiple inhibitory receptors, and suppressive tumor microenvironmental signals. These limitations have driven the development of combination strategies aimed at restoring more effective and sustained antitumor immunity. Among combination approaches, dual immune checkpoint blockade represents the most established strategy. The combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors targets complementary phases of the immune response: early T-cell priming in lymphoid organs and effector function within the tumor microenvironment. Long-term clinical data across melanoma, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, and hepatocellular carcinoma support the ability of this approach to induce durable survival in a meaningful proportion of patients, albeit with increased immune-related toxicity. Building on this foundation, next-generation checkpoint combinations aim to counteract adaptive resistance and T-cell exhaustion. In particular, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT are frequently co-expressed with programmed death-1 on dysfunctional T cells. Emerging checkpoints such as VISTA, B7–H3, and BTLA further expand the landscape, particularly by modulating myeloid-driven suppression and advanced T-cell dysfunction. In parallel, bispecific antibodies integrating dual checkpoint targeting within a single molecule may enhance coordinated pathway inhibition and tumor localization. Immune checkpoint–based combinations represent an evolving strategy of immune restoration. Future advances will depend on biologically informed trial design, dynamic biomarkers, and rational optimization of dose and sequencing to maximize durable benefit while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Journal of Translational Medicine
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Imperial College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.