A Tri-Sector Model for Market Emancipation: Bridging the Algorithmic Divide

The rapid dissemination of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across global markets presents a complex paradox for macromarketing: while AI has the potential to expand market access and efficiency, it may also reinforce inequality through algorithmic bias, data asymmetries, and digital exclusion. This article proposes that a tri-sector governance model integrating the capabilities of private sector, government, and civil society can help govern AI-mediated marketing systems in ways that safeguard consumer agency, reduce vulnerability, and promote social welfare. By moving beyond a purely market-driven approach, the tri-sector model delineates how Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), proactive public policy, and social advocacy can co-create a post-human landscape that prioritizes human dignity and addresses wicked problems. The study concludes that market emancipation in the age of AI will not be a default outcome of technological progress and must be a deliberate achievement of tri-sector alignment. A key recommendation is that the governance of AI must include representation from all three sectors, and ultimately, as the technology approaches super-intelligence, representation of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Macromarketing
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261473838
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tri-Sector Model for Market Emancipation: Bridging the Algorithmic Divide

Can Uslay, Jagdish N. Sheth, Mesut Çiçek, Sevincgul Ulu
Journal of Macromarketing
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Tri-Sector Model for Market Emancipation: Bridging the Algorithmic Divide

Can Uslay, Jagdish N. Sheth, Mesut Çiçek, Sevincgul Ulu
article en

Abstract

The rapid dissemination of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across global markets presents a complex paradox for macromarketing: while AI has the potential to expand market access and efficiency, it may also reinforce inequality through algorithmic bias, data asymmetries, and digital exclusion. This article proposes that a tri-sector governance model integrating the capabilities of private sector, government, and civil society can help govern AI-mediated marketing systems in ways that safeguard consumer agency, reduce vulnerability, and promote social welfare. By moving beyond a purely market-driven approach, the tri-sector model delineates how Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), proactive public policy, and social advocacy can co-create a post-human landscape that prioritizes human dignity and addresses wicked problems. The study concludes that market emancipation in the age of AI will not be a default outcome of technological progress and must be a deliberate achievement of tri-sector alignment. A key recommendation is that the governance of AI must include representation from all three sectors, and ultimately, as the technology approaches super-intelligence, representation of AI.

Journal of Macromarketing
Emory University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Washington State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.