Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Soil Wetting Front Dynamics Under Drip Irrigation System

Accurate prediction of wetted width and wetted depth is essential for optimizing water use efficiency in drip irrigation systems. Existing empirical models are often restricted to specific soil textures and cannot adequately capture the complex nonlinear interactions among soil hydro-physical and chemical properties, irrigation variables, and different soil textures. This study evaluated four machine learning algorithms—Linear Support Vector Machine (Linear SVM), Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (Medium Gaussian SVM), Matern 5/2 Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Boosted Tree Regression—for predicting wetted width and wetted depth in sand and sandy loam soils. Model inputs included emitter discharge, irrigation duration, and selected soil hydro-physical and chemical properties. Models were developed using a 70% training dataset and validated with the remaining 30%. The Matern 5/2 GPR achieved the highest training accuracy for wetted width (R2 = 0.99; RMSE = 0.74) and wetted depth (R2 = 0.98; RMSE = 0.90), but validation errors increased to RMSE values of 2.27 and 3.84, respectively. Medium Gaussian SVM yielded the lowest validation RMSE (2.11) for wetted width, whereas Boosted Tree Regression achieved the best wetted depth prediction (RMSE = 2.11; MAE = 1.69). These findings demonstrate the importance of model-specific selection for reliable irrigation management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology13080209
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Soil Wetting Front Dynamics Under Drip Irrigation System

Peter P. Ikubanni, O. M. Abioye, Oluwaseun Temitope Faloye, Olusegun K. Abass et al.
Hydrology
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Soil Wetting Front Dynamics Under Drip Irrigation System

Peter P. Ikubanni, O. M. Abioye, Oluwaseun Temitope Faloye, Olusegun K. Abass, Viroon Kamchoom‬, Abiodun Okunola, Natdanai Sinsamutpadung, Laemthong Laokhongthavorn
article en

Abstract

Accurate prediction of wetted width and wetted depth is essential for optimizing water use efficiency in drip irrigation systems. Existing empirical models are often restricted to specific soil textures and cannot adequately capture the complex nonlinear interactions among soil hydro-physical and chemical properties, irrigation variables, and different soil textures. This study evaluated four machine learning algorithms—Linear Support Vector Machine (Linear SVM), Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (Medium Gaussian SVM), Matern 5/2 Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Boosted Tree Regression—for predicting wetted width and wetted depth in sand and sandy loam soils. Model inputs included emitter discharge, irrigation duration, and selected soil hydro-physical and chemical properties. Models were developed using a 70% training dataset and validated with the remaining 30%. The Matern 5/2 GPR achieved the highest training accuracy for wetted width (R2 = 0.99; RMSE = 0.74) and wetted depth (R2 = 0.98; RMSE = 0.90), but validation errors increased to RMSE values of 2.27 and 3.84, respectively. Medium Gaussian SVM yielded the lowest validation RMSE (2.11) for wetted width, whereas Boosted Tree Regression achieved the best wetted depth prediction (RMSE = 2.11; MAE = 1.69). These findings demonstrate the importance of model-specific selection for reliable irrigation management.

HydrologyVol. 13(8)
Bowen University (NG), Landmark University (NG), Federal University Oye Ekiti (NG), King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.