Input Variability in Foreign Language Verb–Argument Construction Learning: A Primary School Intervention

Abstract Input variability (i.e., varied experience with different grammar exemplars; “[talk/think/rant/wonder] about [god/bicycles/dogs]”) can improve generalization (i.e., “[Verb] about [Noun]”) and enhance learning. Controlled experiments show that input variability benefits children's generalization and extension of linguistic information from input structures to novel contexts (Wonnacott et al., 2012). Such findings drove our investigation into extending input variability benefits to classrooms. Following a usage‐based constructionist approach, we present a two‐week quasi‐experimental teaching intervention with two British Year 2 classes learning German (6‐to‐7‐year‐olds; 20 students per class). The intervention featured a variability and no‐variability condition, using 16 German “approach” event verb–argument constructions (“To the X [verb] the Y”), featuring four separate or just one verb in the verb slot, respectively. Posttests indicated that children exposed to variability generalized better to novel verbs. The findings corroborate controlled experiments. Even in “noisy” classrooms, input variability can benefit students’ construction generalization and extension to novel verbs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.70051
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Input Variability in Foreign Language Verb–Argument Construction Learning: A Primary School Intervention

Johannes Schulz, Victoria Murphy, Elizabeth Wonnacott
Language Learning
Language Development and Disorders
article

Input Variability in Foreign Language Verb–Argument Construction Learning: A Primary School Intervention

Johannes Schulz, Victoria Murphy, Elizabeth Wonnacott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Input variability (i.e., varied experience with different grammar exemplars; “[talk/think/rant/wonder] about [god/bicycles/dogs]”) can improve generalization (i.e., “[Verb] about [Noun]”) and enhance learning. Controlled experiments show that input variability benefits children's generalization and extension of linguistic information from input structures to novel contexts (Wonnacott et al., 2012). Such findings drove our investigation into extending input variability benefits to classrooms. Following a usage‐based constructionist approach, we present a two‐week quasi‐experimental teaching intervention with two British Year 2 classes learning German (6‐to‐7‐year‐olds; 20 students per class). The intervention featured a variability and no‐variability condition, using 16 German “approach” event verb–argument constructions (“To the X [verb] the Y”), featuring four separate or just one verb in the verb slot, respectively. Posttests indicated that children exposed to variability generalized better to novel verbs. The findings corroborate controlled experiments. Even in “noisy” classrooms, input variability can benefit students’ construction generalization and extension to novel verbs.

Language Learning
University of Oxford (GB), University of Education Freiburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Input Variability in Foreign Language Verb–Argument Construction Learning: A Primary School Intervention — Johannes Schulz, Victoria Murphy, et al. · Language Learning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS