Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study

Abstract Background Healthcare utilization is high for people with spinal disorders. We aimed to investigate differences in recommended versus actual healthcare use among individuals with back & neck pain compared to individuals with isolated back or neck pain. Additionally, we aimed to examine variations in healthcare utilization patterns before and after a specialist evaluation based on the location of pain. Methods We linked the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry with health registries, including patients with spinal disorders registered between January 1 st , 2016, and December 31 st , 2020 (9316 patients (63% with back pain, 27% with neck pain, 11% with back & neck pain) aged 18–70 years, mean (SD) age 44 (13) years, 57% females). We studied the percentages being recommended and actually visiting primary care physicians, physical therapists, and chiropractors in primary care and outpatient and inpatient consultations in specialist care after an outpatient specialist evaluation (index consultation), focusing on differences between groups based on the location of spinal pain. Results In total, ~20%-80% followed healthcare recommendations. Patients with back & neck pain followed recommendations less often than patients with back pain (39% (95% CI 35.7, 41.8) vs 45% (95% CI 43.9, 46.4)) or neck pain (44% (95% CI 42.4, 46.3)). Participants with back & neck pain had a proportion of consultations with physical therapists at 29.7% (95% CI 25.1, 34.2) and 25.4% (95% CI 20.7, 30.1) in years 1 and 2 after index consultation, ~6 percentage points higher than the back pain group (1st: −5.8% (95% CI −10.6, −1.0), 2nd: −6.0% (95% CI −11.0, −0.9). They also had a 2 percentage point higher proportion of consultations with primary care physicians compared to the neck pain group (1st: −2.4% (95% CI −4.1, −0.8), 2nd: −1.5% (95% CI −2.7, −0.3)). Conclusions Patients with mixed back & neck pain have lower adherence to recommended care and higher utilization of physical therapy and primary care physicians two years after specialist evaluation compared to patients with isolated spinal pain. These results suggest that the current approach to managing spinal pain should be reconsidered to better address the complex needs of this patient group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15256-w
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study

Kjersti Storheim, Jan Hartvigsen, Kåre Rønn Richardsen, Lise Grethe Kjønø et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Healthcare utilization in patients with spinal disorders referred for specialist evaluation in Norway: an observational register-based cohort study

Kjersti Storheim, Jan Hartvigsen, Kåre Rønn Richardsen, Lise Grethe Kjønø, Marianne Bakke Johnsen, Karin Magnusson, Bjørnar Berg, Margreth Grotle, Stine Haugaard Clausen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare utilization is high for people with spinal disorders. We aimed to investigate differences in recommended versus actual healthcare use among individuals with back & neck pain compared to individuals with isolated back or neck pain. Additionally, we aimed to examine variations in healthcare utilization patterns before and after a specialist evaluation based on the location of pain. Methods We linked the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry with health registries, including patients with spinal disorders registered between January 1 st , 2016, and December 31 st , 2020 (9316 patients (63% with back pain, 27% with neck pain, 11% with back & neck pain) aged 18–70 years, mean (SD) age 44 (13) years, 57% females). We studied the percentages being recommended and actually visiting primary care physicians, physical therapists, and chiropractors in primary care and outpatient and inpatient consultations in specialist care after an outpatient specialist evaluation (index consultation), focusing on differences between groups based on the location of spinal pain. Results In total, ~20%-80% followed healthcare recommendations. Patients with back & neck pain followed recommendations less often than patients with back pain (39% (95% CI 35.7, 41.8) vs 45% (95% CI 43.9, 46.4)) or neck pain (44% (95% CI 42.4, 46.3)). Participants with back & neck pain had a proportion of consultations with physical therapists at 29.7% (95% CI 25.1, 34.2) and 25.4% (95% CI 20.7, 30.1) in years 1 and 2 after index consultation, ~6 percentage points higher than the back pain group (1st: −5.8% (95% CI −10.6, −1.0), 2nd: −6.0% (95% CI −11.0, −0.9). They also had a 2 percentage point higher proportion of consultations with primary care physicians compared to the neck pain group (1st: −2.4% (95% CI −4.1, −0.8), 2nd: −1.5% (95% CI −2.7, −0.3)). Conclusions Patients with mixed back & neck pain have lower adherence to recommended care and higher utilization of physical therapy and primary care physicians two years after specialist evaluation compared to patients with isolated spinal pain. These results suggest that the current approach to managing spinal pain should be reconsidered to better address the complex needs of this patient group.

BMC Health Services Research
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Southern Denmark (DK), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Lund University (SE), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.