Effectiveness, safety, and implementation outcomes of a decentralization program to deliver antivenoms in the Western Brazilian Amazonia: The SAVING program

BACKGROUND: Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a major cause of morbidity in mortality in low-income and middle-income countries. In Brazil, SBE disproportionately affects Indigenous populations. Limited access to antivenom treatment is a key determinant of poor outcomes in these populations. We evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of a decentralized model of antivenom delivery in Indigenous primary health settings in the Brazilian Amazon. METHODS: An implementation study was carried out in four Indigenous Health Poles across Amazonas state, Brazil. Effectiveness was assessed using a pre-post design based on national surveillance data, comparing time to antivenom administration, clinical severity, specific clinical manifestations, and case-fatality before and after implementation. Occurrence of early adverse reactions from antivenom treatment was assessed. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Indigenous patients, health-care providers, and health-system managers to assess acceptability, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 125 patients treated after decentralization, the proportion receiving antivenom within 6 hours after bite was significantly higher than under usual care (75.8% vs 40.8%; OR 4·5, 95% CI 2·6-7·9). Proportion of mild envenomations were more frequent after decentralization (50.4% vs 32.7%; OR 2·1, 95% CI 1·2-3·6). Five deaths (4%) were reported in the usual care group and one death (0.8%) was reported in the intervention group (5.3, 95% CI 0.6-45.9). Three (2.4%) patients had mild skin adverse reactions, which were properly managed without need for hospital transfer. A high acceptability was observed among Indigenous users and health providers, combined with good compliance by the providers with the clinical protocol and improved trust in local health services. Health providers and managers at all levels expressed willingness to support sustained antivenom delivery in the study settings and scale up to other Indigenous areas. CONCLUSION: Decentralization improved access to antivenom treatment and reduced poor clinical outcomes. Culturally adapted, decentralized care can be safely implemented in remote settings, with important implications for equitable health system strengthening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014612
Primary Topic
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness, safety, and implementation outcomes of a decentralization program to deliver antivenoms in the Western Brazilian Amazonia: The SAVING program

Fan Hui Wen, Deugles Cardoso, Flávio Santos Dourado, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci et al.
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
article

Effectiveness, safety, and implementation outcomes of a decentralization program to deliver antivenoms in the Western Brazilian Amazonia: The SAVING program

Fan Hui Wen, Deugles Cardoso, Flávio Santos Dourado, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Altair Seabra de Farias, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Élder Augusto Guimarães Figueira, Érica Cristina da Silva Chagas, Taynnah da Silva Lima, Thiago Serrão Pinto, Nilzoney Ferreira de Souza, Francisco Edilson Ferreira de Lima-Junior, Vinícius Machado, Alicia Cacau Dos Santos, Leonardo da Silva Ipuchima, Jacqueline Sachett, Felipe Murta, Fernando Almeida-Val, David G. Lalloo, Charles J. Gerardo, Luana Souza Habibe, Nicholas R. Casewell, Marcus Lacerda, Lucia Montebello
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a major cause of morbidity in mortality in low-income and middle-income countries. In Brazil, SBE disproportionately affects Indigenous populations. Limited access to antivenom treatment is a key determinant of poor outcomes in these populations. We evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of a decentralized model of antivenom delivery in Indigenous primary health settings in the Brazilian Amazon. METHODS: An implementation study was carried out in four Indigenous Health Poles across Amazonas state, Brazil. Effectiveness was assessed using a pre-post design based on national surveillance data, comparing time to antivenom administration, clinical severity, specific clinical manifestations, and case-fatality before and after implementation. Occurrence of early adverse reactions from antivenom treatment was assessed. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Indigenous patients, health-care providers, and health-system managers to assess acceptability, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 125 patients treated after decentralization, the proportion receiving antivenom within 6 hours after bite was significantly higher than under usual care (75.8% vs 40.8%; OR 4·5, 95% CI 2·6-7·9). Proportion of mild envenomations were more frequent after decentralization (50.4% vs 32.7%; OR 2·1, 95% CI 1·2-3·6). Five deaths (4%) were reported in the usual care group and one death (0.8%) was reported in the intervention group (5.3, 95% CI 0.6-45.9). Three (2.4%) patients had mild skin adverse reactions, which were properly managed without need for hospital transfer. A high acceptability was observed among Indigenous users and health providers, combined with good compliance by the providers with the clinical protocol and improved trust in local health services. Health providers and managers at all levels expressed willingness to support sustained antivenom delivery in the study settings and scale up to other Indigenous areas. CONCLUSION: Decentralization improved access to antivenom treatment and reduced poor clinical outcomes. Culturally adapted, decentralized care can be safely implemented in remote settings, with important implications for equitable health system strengthening.

PLoS neglected tropical diseasesVol. 20(8)
Duke University (US), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Instituto Butantan (BR), Fundação de Medicina Tropical (BR), Ministério da Saúde (BR), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (BR), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Ministério da Saúde, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, Fogarty International Center
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.